1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1990.tb00641.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic instability and hypervariability in Streptomyces ambofaciens: towards an understanding of a mechanism of genome plasticity

Abstract: Many Streptomyces species exhibit a very high degree of genetic instability which is usually manifested as genomic rearrangements such as large deletions. In Streptomyces ambofaciens DSM40697, two levels of genetic instability were previously described: (i) a basic genetic instability similar to that reported for other strains, and (ii) hypervariability, a phenomenon that we believe to be a new aspect of instability closely associated with DNA amplification. A large DNA region undergoes deletions, amplificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact sizes of the deletions are not known. It is not clear how these deletions occurred, but in the studied genetic instability of the Streptomyces chromosomes, tandem amplifications frequently accompany spontaneous deletions at the termini (Cullum et al, 1988;Schrempf et al, 1989;Birch et al, 1990;Leblond et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact sizes of the deletions are not known. It is not clear how these deletions occurred, but in the studied genetic instability of the Streptomyces chromosomes, tandem amplifications frequently accompany spontaneous deletions at the termini (Cullum et al, 1988;Schrempf et al, 1989;Birch et al, 1990;Leblond et al, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deletions of tens to hundreds of kilobases occur spontaneously at frequencies of about 5 × 10 ¹3 and are often accompanied by extensive tandem amplifications of specific sequences (reviewed in Cullum et al, 1988;Schrempf et al, 1989;Birch et al, 1990;Leblond et al, 1990). In S. lividans, one of the most frequently deleted markers is the chloramphenicol (Cm) resistance gene, cmr (Altenbuchner and Cullum, 1984;Dyson and Schrempf, 1987), which was located near one end of the chromosome (Redenbach et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deletions affected the DNA region overlapping both amplifiable loci. PFGE also allowed us to localize the amplified DNA sequences and to establish their structure: amplification takes place at the AUD locus as a tandem array of the wild-type AUD sequence.The Streptomyces genome exhibits a high degree of genome plasticity, consisting of large deletions and amplified DNA sequences (ADS) associated with instability of many characteristics (1,11,13). In Streptomyces ambofaciens DSM40697 (9), two levels of genetic instability were characterized: (i) a basic genetic instability similar to that reported for other Streptomyces spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The Streptomyces genome exhibits a high degree of genome plasticity, consisting of large deletions and amplified DNA sequences (ADS) associated with instability of many characteristics (1,11,13). In Streptomyces ambofaciens DSM40697 (9), two levels of genetic instability were characterized: (i) a basic genetic instability similar to that reported for other Streptomyces spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The 4.3 kb AUD is not flanked by repeats and its amplification has been observed only in S. lividans TKIII-1OT. Other examples of type 1 AUD lacking repeated sequences or carrying only short microhomologies within very short imperfect repeats have been detected within Streptomyces glaucescens (Hausler et al, 1989) and S. ambofaciens (Leblond et al, 1990). In contrast, two tandem copies of AUDl (consisting of three 1 kb repeats which flank two 4.7 kb parts) reside in the 'silent' region of S. lividans wild-type chromosome (Altenbuchner & Cullum, 1985 ;Piendl et af., 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%