The Escherichia coli  sliding clamp, which is encoded by the dnaN gene, is reported to interact with a variety of proteins involved in different aspects of DNA metabolism. Recent findings indicate that many of these partner proteins interact with a common surface on the  clamp, suggesting that competition between these partners for binding to the clamp might help to coordinate both the nature and order of the events that take place at a replication fork. The purpose of the experiments discussed in this report was to test a prediction of this model, namely, that a mutant  clamp protein impaired for interactions with the replicative DNA polymerase (polymerase III [Pol III]) would likewise have impaired interactions with other partner proteins and hence would display pleiotropic phenotypes. Results discussed herein indicate that the dnaN159-encoded mutant  clamp protein (159) is impaired for interactions with the ␣ catalytic subunit of Pol III. Moreover, the dnaN159 mutant strain displayed multiple replication and repair phenotypes, including sensitivity to UV light, an absolute dependence on the polymerase activity of Pol I for viability, enhanced Pol V-dependent mutagenesis, and altered induction of the global SOS response. Furthermore, epistasis analyses indicated that the UV sensitivity of the dnaN159 mutant was suppressed by (not epistatic with) inactivation of Pol IV (dinB gene product). Taken together, these findings suggest that in the dnaN159 mutant, DNA polymerase usage, and hence DNA replication, repair, and translesion synthesis, are altered. These findings are discussed in terms of a model to describe how the  clamp might help to coordinate protein traffic at the replication fork.It has become increasingly apparent in recent years that DNA replication, recombination, and repair are intimately related to each other (reviewed in reference 7). For example, the Escherichia coli RecA protein is not only required for most homologous recombination but is also required for DNA replication under normal growth conditions (7, 28), as well as for the proper regulation of global cellular responses following DNA damage (13, 47), including replication of damaged DNA (13,47). Moreover, the fact that the same DNA structure may serve as a substrate for both DNA replication and homologous recombination indicates that mechanisms must exist for coordinately regulating these processes in vivo (48). Consistent with the need for such regulation, processing of replication intermediates by recombination is proposed to serve as one cause of genome instability and is suspected to be a contributing factor to the development of certain cancers in humans (25). The fact that E. coli possesses at least five distinct DNA polymerases and that humans possess at least 16 DNA polymerases (reviewed in references 11, 12, and 48) further underscores the need organisms have for a higher-order regulatory system that acts to coordinate the actions of the cell's different DNA polymerases with those of its various repair and recombination pr...