2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-16504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic mechanisms regulating the host response during mastitis

Abstract: Mastitis is a very costly and common disease in the dairy industry. The study of the transcriptome from healthy and mastitic milk somatic cell samples using RNA-Sequencing technology can provide measurements of transcript levels associated with the immune response to the infection. The objective of this study was to characterize the Holstein milk somatic cell transcriptome from 6 cows to determine host response to intramammary infections. RNA-Sequencing was performed on 2 samples from each cow from 2 separate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of variance explained by non-overlapping windows were estimated using the PostGSf90 algorithm by summing the variance of SNPs within 1 Mb 82 . Windows that explained greater than 1% of the genetic variance for SC and SM were selected for QTL and gene annotation 83 , conducted using R (Version 4.0.0.; R Core Team, 2020) and the R package: Genomic Annotation in Livestock for positional candidate LOci (GALLO— https://github.com/pablobio/GALLO ). The .gtf annotation file corresponding to the bovine gene annotation from ARS-UCD1.2 assembly and the .gff file with the QTL information from Animal QTL Database 84 , using the same reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2) to map the QTLs, were used for gene and QTL annotation, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proportion of variance explained by non-overlapping windows were estimated using the PostGSf90 algorithm by summing the variance of SNPs within 1 Mb 82 . Windows that explained greater than 1% of the genetic variance for SC and SM were selected for QTL and gene annotation 83 , conducted using R (Version 4.0.0.; R Core Team, 2020) and the R package: Genomic Annotation in Livestock for positional candidate LOci (GALLO— https://github.com/pablobio/GALLO ). The .gtf annotation file corresponding to the bovine gene annotation from ARS-UCD1.2 assembly and the .gff file with the QTL information from Animal QTL Database 84 , using the same reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2) to map the QTLs, were used for gene and QTL annotation, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of variance explained by non-overlapping windows were estimated using the PostGSf90 algorithm by summing the variance of SNPs within 1 Mb 82 . Windows that explained greater than 1% of the genetic variance for SC and SM were selected for QTL and gene annotation 83 www.nature.com/scientificreports/ enrichment analysis was also conducted using the GALLO R package for all the QTL information annotated within the candidate windows using a chromosome-based enrichment analysis. Briefly, a bootstrap approach was used to compare the observed number of QTL for each trait in each chromosome annotated using GALLO with the expected number for each trait estimated using 1000 iteration rounds of random sampling from the whole Cattle QTLdb.…”
Section: Genotyping and Quality Control Genotyping Was Completed Fromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential gene expression analyses were performed using the CLC Genomics Workbench software 20.0 as described by Asselstine et al (2019) using a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM). The GLM assumes that the expression levels follow a negative binomial distribution.…”
Section: Differential Gene Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the variants are common throughout the globe as ruminant specific S. aureus while others are geographic related in the literature [23]. Inflammatory respondent metabolic pathways (BoLA-DRA, GLYCAM1, FCER1G, B2M, CD74, NFKBIA and SDS), milk constituent associated (CSN2 and CSN3) and immunity related (B2M and CD74) are also specific strains of S. aureus of dairy mastitis [24,25].…”
Section: Staphylococcus Aureus Strains Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%