1977
DOI: 10.1080/00071667708416386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic parameter estimates and strain comparisons of egg compositional traits1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the positive maternal-direct genetic correlations between yolk traits and HATCH are in line with the positive effects of yolk traits on hatchability found by Nestor & Noble (1995). The negative maternal -direct genetic correlation between albumen weight and HATCH is probably due to the high positive correlation with egg weight (Rodda et al, 1977;Hartmann et al, 2000). There was also a positive maternal-direct genetic correlation between albumen dry matter and HATCH in this study.…”
Section: Relationships Between Reproduction Traits and Egg Compositionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, the positive maternal-direct genetic correlations between yolk traits and HATCH are in line with the positive effects of yolk traits on hatchability found by Nestor & Noble (1995). The negative maternal -direct genetic correlation between albumen weight and HATCH is probably due to the high positive correlation with egg weight (Rodda et al, 1977;Hartmann et al, 2000). There was also a positive maternal-direct genetic correlation between albumen dry matter and HATCH in this study.…”
Section: Relationships Between Reproduction Traits and Egg Compositionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It should be kept in mind that the present genetic parameters are only valid for the range of values of the egg composition traits in the studied population. The positive genetic correlations between FERT and albumen weight and yolk weight are probably due to the autocorrelation between the traits and egg weight (Rodda et al, 1977;Hartmann et al, 2000).…”
Section: Relationships Between Reproduction Traits and Egg Compositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, Rodda et al (1977) and Friars et al (1978) reported significant differences between strains selected for high egg production and unselected control strains in albumen percent solids and in percent albumen of the whole eggs but no strain effects on the yolk percent solids. Hafez et al (1955), Marion et al (1964), Varadarjulu and Cunningham (1972), and Rodda et al (1974) also have observed significant strain effects for various egg composition traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recently Rodda et al (1977) has reported some genetic relation between egg weight and conipositional traits and several papers have appeared on the effect of breed or inheritance on cholesterol and fat content of eggs (Edwards et al, 1960; Clark et al, 1964;Cunningham et al, 1974; Washburn et al, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For marketing purposes eggs are usually classified only by size, shell strength, and whatever can be seen by passing light through them. Therefore breeders have little incentive t o obtain any changes in the internal composition.Recently Rodda et al (1977) has reported some genetic relation between egg weight and conipositional traits and several papers have appeared on the effect of breed or inheritance on cholesterol and fat content of eggs (Edwards et al, 1960; Clark et al, 1964;Cunningham et al, 1974; Washburn et al, 1974).The main objective of the project reported here was to look for a possible quantitative difference in the protein and lipid components of the eggs as a result of specialized selection for high rate of lay and high egg weight. Furthermore, we looked for relations bettveen blood parameters, production parameters and egg composition traits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%