2020
DOI: 10.1071/an18677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic potential of Sindhi cattle for A2 milk production

Abstract: ContextCow milk is consumed in many countries. However, its consumption can be associated with gastrointestinal disorders in humans. The genetic profile of β-casein is one of the factors responsible for these disorders and the A1 variant is a causal agent. The β-casein A1 leads to the formation of bioactive peptides, which trigger intestinal reactions. The same is not observed for the A2 allele. A2 milk is obtained from cows with the A2A2 genotype. The identification of breeds and selection of animals for A2 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the A1 and A2 β-casein genetic variants is a single nucleotide polymorphism at position 8101 of the CSN2 gene, which changes the codon for the amino acid at position 67 from proline (Pro67: A2 β-casein) to histidine (His67: A1 β-casein) in the polypeptide chain (Schettini et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the A1 and A2 β-casein genetic variants is a single nucleotide polymorphism at position 8101 of the CSN2 gene, which changes the codon for the amino acid at position 67 from proline (Pro67: A2 β-casein) to histidine (His67: A1 β-casein) in the polypeptide chain (Schettini et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural and functional differences between A1 and A2 β‐casein variants and their digested peptides are closely associated with human health (Figure 3) (Bodnár et al., 2018; Kaskous, 2020; Pal et al., 2015). In fact, the minor difference between the two isoforms is the variation in the amino acid at the 67th position in the primary sequence of the protein chain (Kay et al., 2021; Schettini et al., 2020). A2 β‐casein has proline at this position, whereas A1 β‐casein has histidine (Caroli et al., 2016).…”
Section: Bovine Milk Casein and β‐Caseinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural and functional differences between A1 and A2 β-casein variants and their digested peptides are closely associated with human health (Figure 3) (Bodnár et al, 2018;Kaskous, 2020;Pal et al, 2015). In fact, the minor difference between the two isoforms is the variation in the amino acid at the 67th position in the primary sequence of the The N-terminal (1-60) contains a phosphoserine phthalate group, H. Arg-Glu-Leu-Glu-Glu-Leu-Asn-Val-Pro-Gly-Glu-IIe-Val-Glu-Ser-Leu-Ser-Ser-Ser-Glu-Glu-Ser-IIe-Thr-Arg-IIe-Asn-Lys-Lys-IIe-Glu-Lys-Phe-Gln-Ser-Glu-Glu-GLn-Gln-GLn-Thr-Glu-Asp-GLu-Leu-GLn-Asp-Lys-IIe-His-Pro-Phe-ALa-Gln-Thr-GLn-Ser-Leu-Val-Tyr-Pro-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro-IIe-Pro-Asn-Ser-Leu-Pro-GLn-Asn-IIe-Pro-Pro-Leu-Thr-GLn-Thr-Pro-Val-Val-Val-Pro-Pro-Phe-Leu-Gln-Pro-Glu-Val-Met-Gly-Val-Ser-Lys-Val-Lys-Glu-Ala-Met-Ala-Pro-Lys-His-Lys-Glu-Met-Pro-Phe-Pro-Lys-Thr-Pro-Val-Glu-Pro-Phe-Thr-Glu-Ser-GIn-Ser-Leu-Thr-Leu-Thr-Asp-Val-Glu-Asn-Leu-His-Leu-Pro-Leu-Pro-Leu-Leu-GLn-Ser-Trp-Met-His-Gln-Pro-His-Gln-Pro-Leu-Pro-Pro-Thr-Val-Met-Phe-Pro-Pro-GLn-Ser-Val-Leu-Ser-Leu-Ser-Gln-Ser-Lys-Val-Leu-Pro-Val-Pro-Gln-Lys-Ala-Val-Pro-Tyr-Pro-GLn-Arg-Asp-Met-Pro-IIe-Gln-Ala-Phe-Leu-Leu-Tyr-Gln-Gln-Pro-Val-Leu-Gly-Pro-Val-Arg-Gly-Pro-Phe-Pro-IIe-IIe-Val.OH protein chain (Kay et al, 2021;Schettini et al, 2020). A2 βcasein has proline at this position, whereas A1 β-casein has histidine (Caroli et al, 2016).…”
Section: Composition Of β-Caseinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genotyping tests of beta-casein CNS2 gene in cattle herds have increased considerably over the last few years, since the demand for cattle with A2A2 genotypes has intensified due to the greater demand for milk and dairy products exclusively of A2 type. However, most of the research is strictly related to genotyping the animals ( Gustavsson et al, 2014 , Kamiński et al, 2006 , Keating et al, 2008 , Lien et al, 1999 , Rangel et al, 2017 , Royo et al, 2014 , Visker et al, 2010 , Ristanic et al, 2020 , Schettini et al, 2020 , Ivanković et al, 2021 , Ladyka, 2021 , Teixeira et al, 2021 ). The first study that was developed to genotype the CSN2 gene alleles directly in milk samples was accomplished by Giglioti et al, (2020) , that evaluated two methods: high-resolution melting (HRM) and rhAmp® SNP genotyping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%