2003
DOI: 10.1080/0301446032000112670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic profile based upon 15 microsatellites of four caste groups of the eastern Indian state, Bihar

Abstract: The present study clearly depicts the genetic profile of these caste groups, their inherent closeness in the past, and the impact of the imposed caste system that later restricted the gene flow. The study highlights the status of Bhumihar and Kayasth in the Hindu caste system. The former was found clustering with the Brahmin group (as expected, since Bhumihar is known to be a subclass of Brahmin), whereas the distance between the Brahmin and Kayasth caste groups was found to be large. North-eastern Indian Mong… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low value of F ST , 0.0084, indicates a lesser degree of genetic differentiation between the nine studied populations, either because of the presence of the same recent common ancestor or because of heavy gene flow between the population groups in the past. The results are in congruence with other published reports on populations from Orissa (Sahoo and Kashyap 2005), Karnataka (Rajkumar and Kashyap 2004), and Bihar (Ashma and Kashyap 2003). However, it has been shown that the F ST value can be affected by the nature of the polymorphism studied; high heterozygosity estimates at multi-allelic STR loci often result in diminution of the F ST values (Tishkoff and Kidd 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Sociocultural Barriers On Genetic Differentiationsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The low value of F ST , 0.0084, indicates a lesser degree of genetic differentiation between the nine studied populations, either because of the presence of the same recent common ancestor or because of heavy gene flow between the population groups in the past. The results are in congruence with other published reports on populations from Orissa (Sahoo and Kashyap 2005), Karnataka (Rajkumar and Kashyap 2004), and Bihar (Ashma and Kashyap 2003). However, it has been shown that the F ST value can be affected by the nature of the polymorphism studied; high heterozygosity estimates at multi-allelic STR loci often result in diminution of the F ST values (Tishkoff and Kidd 2004).…”
Section: Role Of Sociocultural Barriers On Genetic Differentiationsupporting
confidence: 92%