2006
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Profiling of Epithelial Cells Expressing E-Cadherin Repressors Reveals a Distinct Role for Snail, Slug, and E47 Factors in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Abstract: The transcription factors Snail, Slug, and bHLH E47 have been recently described as direct repressors of E-cadherin and inducers of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion when overexpressed in epithelial cells. Although a role of those factors in tumor progression and invasion has been proposed, whether the different repressors play distinct or redundant roles in the tumorigenic process has not been established. To further investigate this important issue, we have analyzed the gene expression pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
241
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 277 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
15
241
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, direct binding of SNAI1 to proximal E-boxes of the CRB3 promoter was demonstrated in MDCK-SNAI1 cells (Whiteman et al, 2008), in contrast to previous suggestions from breast carcinomas (Aigner et al, 2007). As mentioned above, other core polarity genes like DLG3 are thought to be downregulated by several EMT inducers, including SNAI1/SNAI2 and bHLH factors (E47/TCF3, E2-2/ TCF4), both in MDCK and mouse carcinoma cells (Moreno-Bueno et al, 2006;Peinado et al, 2008;Sobrado V, Moreno-Bueno G et al, unpublished), although no functional promoter studies are yet available. Taken together, these observations suggest that different EMT transcriptional inducers act cooperatively to repress factors involved in determining polarity, which could reinforce the suppression of apical-basal polarity that is required for cells to undergo EMT.…”
Section: Regulation Of Cell Polarity Genes During Emtmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, direct binding of SNAI1 to proximal E-boxes of the CRB3 promoter was demonstrated in MDCK-SNAI1 cells (Whiteman et al, 2008), in contrast to previous suggestions from breast carcinomas (Aigner et al, 2007). As mentioned above, other core polarity genes like DLG3 are thought to be downregulated by several EMT inducers, including SNAI1/SNAI2 and bHLH factors (E47/TCF3, E2-2/ TCF4), both in MDCK and mouse carcinoma cells (Moreno-Bueno et al, 2006;Peinado et al, 2008;Sobrado V, Moreno-Bueno G et al, unpublished), although no functional promoter studies are yet available. Taken together, these observations suggest that different EMT transcriptional inducers act cooperatively to repress factors involved in determining polarity, which could reinforce the suppression of apical-basal polarity that is required for cells to undergo EMT.…”
Section: Regulation Of Cell Polarity Genes During Emtmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In fact, direct binding of SNAI1/SNAI2 to conserved E-box elements in the corresponding promoters has been reported for occludin, claudin-1 and claudin-7 (Ikenouchi et al, 2003;Martı´nez-Estrada et al, 2006). Interestingly, downregulation of claudin-4, the junctional adhesion molecule-1 (JAM-1/JAM-A) and Dlg3 has been detected in gene profiling studies of carcinoma cells, as well as in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells undergoing EMT after expression of SNAI1, SNAI2, E47 or other EMT regulators (De Craene et al, 2005b;Moreno-Bueno et al, 2006;Peinado et al, 2008). Because of the close relationship between tight junctions and the organization of epithelial cell polarity, these observations suggest that components of the core cell polarity complexes could also be direct targets of EMT transcriptional regulators.…”
Section: Regulation Of Cell Polarity Genes During Emtmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, a recent gene profiling study of the E-cadherin repressors Snail, Slug, and e47 in MDCK cells found more divergence than similarity in their gene expression profiles. This led the authors to conclude that there are different "EMT programs" corresponding to different states of epithelial plasticity and that specific pathways contribute to distinct aspects of EMT [37]. Thus, tumor phenotype would likely reflect the particular complement of EMT regulatory factors expressed in cells or within the tumor microenvironment [30,31,38] and account for the divergence from a "classical" EMT that is frequently observed in cancer.…”
Section: Phenotypic Plasticity In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Downregula-tion of E-cadherin is a critical disruptor of epithelial homeostasis, leading to the adoption of a mesenchymal behavior (Nagafuchi et al, 1987;Thiery, 2002). Loss of E-cadherin is modulated by transcriptional repressors like Snail, Slug, Zeb 1/2 and the basic helix-loop-helix factors E47 and Twist (Moreno-Bueno et al, 2006). Activation of SMADs by TGF-b recruits Snail (Vincent et al, 2009), Zeb (Comijn et al, 2001) or Twist (Thuault et al, 2006), which repress E-cadherin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%