2006
DOI: 10.1142/s0217979206035825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Programming Approach for Electron-Alkali-Metal Atom Collisions

Abstract: New technique is presented for modeling the total cross sections of electron scattering by Na, K, Rb and Cs atoms in the low and intermediate energy regions. The calculations have been performed in the framework of genetic programming ( GP ) technique. The GP has been running based on the experimental data of the total collisional cross sections to produce the total cross sections for each target atom. The incident energy and atomic number as well as the static dipole polarizability have been used as input var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We notice that our GTB model calculations give an improvement upon the theoretical models. Also, in comparison with our previous work (Genetic Programming model [15,16]) we have found that the GTB model gives best fitting in very short computational time (0.73 sec).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We notice that our GTB model calculations give an improvement upon the theoretical models. Also, in comparison with our previous work (Genetic Programming model [15,16]) we have found that the GTB model gives best fitting in very short computational time (0.73 sec).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Recently, there are a number of machine learning techniques such as neural networks and genetic programming [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] used to predict and model the total cross sections. The reason for applying machine learning methods (based on statistical learning theory or biological inspired techniques, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%