2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-016-0083-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic programming based monthly groundwater level forecast models with uncertainty quantification

Abstract: Modeling hydrogeologic processes facilitates in accurate prediction/forecasting of groundwater level variations. Still, the uncertainty in model prediction is a major concern that requires detailed investigation. There could be several factors which introduce uncertainty such as inherent assumption, various levels of model complexity and simplicity. In general, model inputs, parameters and structure are the major sources of uncertainty while quantifying model prediction uncertainty. In this study, a genetic pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Savic et al (1999) used GP to create a rainfall-runoff model whose formula only relied on rainfall from previous days. Researchers used GP to create models for monthly groundwater levels from several wells, where GP showed good performance but prescribed complex functions of rainfall forcing and groundwater level in past time steps (Kasiviswanathan et al, 2016). When GP was used to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity (K s ), it generated a simple, regression-like equation (Fallah-Mehdipour et al, 2013).…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savic et al (1999) used GP to create a rainfall-runoff model whose formula only relied on rainfall from previous days. Researchers used GP to create models for monthly groundwater levels from several wells, where GP showed good performance but prescribed complex functions of rainfall forcing and groundwater level in past time steps (Kasiviswanathan et al, 2016). When GP was used to predict saturated hydraulic conductivity (K s ), it generated a simple, regression-like equation (Fallah-Mehdipour et al, 2013).…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, support vector machine (SVM) a relatively newer technique has also been used for the groundwater level prediction in various site conditions (Yoon et al, 2011;He et al, 2014;Gong et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2017). More recently, fuzzy theory and genetic programming (GP) have also been used to study the groundwater levels (Kurtulus and Razack, 2010;GĂŒler et al, 2012;Shiri and Kisi, 2011;Fallah-Mehdipour et al, 2013;Kasiviswanathan et al, 2016). Further, latest techniques like extreme learning machine (ELM) which are much simple in design and application then ANN or SVM have also been used in groundwater modelling studies (Yadav and Eliza, 2017;Alizamir et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out in many studies that the generalization ability of machine learning based models are significantly influenced by selection of appropriate input variable (Maier and Dandy, 2000;Galelli et al, 2014;Quilty et al, 2016;Sahoo et al, 2017). The most obvious input variables in groundwater level predictions studies are rainfall, evaporation, temperature and pumping patterns (Yoon et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2014;Mohanty et al, 2015;Kasiviswanathan, 2016;Chang et al, 2016;Barzegar et al, 2017;Wunsch, 2018). Further, groundwater levels are also partially controlled by interannual to multidecadal climate variability (Kuss and Gurdak, 2014;Sahoo et al, 2017;Velasco et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such research studies that closely monitor different economic segments (i.e., high, middle, and low income) in the urban settlements for the possible changes in supply-demand patterns during the post-COVID-19 period will provide additional insights. Thus, creating a comprehensive database for domestic and commercial water use with improved monitoring devices, various machine learning algorithms (Kasiviswanathan et al, 2016;Sun and Scanlon, 2019) and empirical models (Huang et al, 1998) can be exploited to extract the useful information for managing the urban water requirement.…”
Section: Domestic and Commercial Water Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%