2020 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/atc50776.2020.9255428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Programming for automated Synthesizing 3D Artificial Magnetic Conductor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, owing to their smaller particle size than cement grains, nanoclays, such as nano-kaolin, bentonite, mica, and nano-montmorillonite, are utilized as nanofillers in cement-based products which improve chemical, moisture and gas barrier, and mechanical and thermal properties of the material [186]. Nguyen et al [187] found that the combustion rate (mm/min) of epoxy resin/nanoclay/multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites decreased from 28.41 to 20.80, while the LOI (vol. % O2) increased from 20.6 to 24.6.…”
Section: Fire Retardancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, owing to their smaller particle size than cement grains, nanoclays, such as nano-kaolin, bentonite, mica, and nano-montmorillonite, are utilized as nanofillers in cement-based products which improve chemical, moisture and gas barrier, and mechanical and thermal properties of the material [186]. Nguyen et al [187] found that the combustion rate (mm/min) of epoxy resin/nanoclay/multiwalled carbon nanotube nanocomposites decreased from 28.41 to 20.80, while the LOI (vol. % O2) increased from 20.6 to 24.6.…”
Section: Fire Retardancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publication Year Method(s) Application of AI 196 Zhu, Wang, Sun, et al [403] 2020 GA optimization framework 197 Zhu, Wang, Sui, et al [404] 2020 GA optimization framework 198 Tung, Ha-Van, and Seo [405] 2020 GA optimization framework 199 Suraj, Behera, and Badhai [406] 2020 GA optimization framework 200 Jiang, Li, Li, et al [407] 2020 GA optimization framework 201 Whiting, Kang, Campbell, et al [408] 2020 GA optimization framework 202 Cui, Xu, Yu, et al [409] 2020 GA optimization framework 203 Thomes, Mosquera-Sánchez, and De Marqui [410] 2020 GA optimization framework 204 Nguyen, Bui Bach, Bui, et al [411] 2020 genetic programming (GP) optimization framework 205 Li and Yang [412] 2020 NSCGA optimization framework 206 Li and Yang [413] 2020 NSCGA optimization framework 207 Yang, Huang, Song, et al [414] 2020 PSO optimization framework 208 Papathanasopoulos and Rahmat-Samii [415] 2020 PSO optimization framework 209 Diaz, Burckel, Adomanis, et al [416] 2021 GA optimization framework 210 Ahmadi, Vaezi, Harzand, et al [417] 2021 GA optimization framework 211 Gonçalves, Mesquita, and Silva [418] 2021 GA optimization framework 212 Mayer, Bi, Griesse-Nascimento, et al [419] 2022 GA Optimization framework 213 Zong, Zhu, Yu, et al [420] 2022 GA Inverse Design 214 Liu, Wang, Olivier, et al [421] 2022 GA Inverse Design 215 Luo, Lan, Nong, et al [422] 2022 GA Inverse Design 216 Nguyen and Seo [423] 2022 GA Inverse Design 217 Lu, Gao, and Dai [424] 2022 GA Inverse Design 218 Sun, Jiang, and Wang [425] 2023 GA Optimization Framework 219 Feng, Zhang, Cheng, et al [426] 2023 GA Optimization Framework 220 Zhang, Duan, Liu, et al [427] 2023 GA Optimization Framework…”
Section: Continuation Of Tablementioning
confidence: 99%