2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic programming in water resources engineering: A state-of-the-art review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of investigations into the implementation of machine learning (ML) models for evaporation estimation have been conducted across different regions (Abghari, Ahmadi, Besharat, & Rezaverdinejad, 2012;Baydaroǧlu & Koçak, 2014;Di et al, 2019;Fallah-Mehdipour, Bozorg Haddad, & Mariño, 2013;Fotovatikhah, Herrera, Shamshirband, Ardabili, & Piran, 2018;Lu et al, 2018;Majhi, Naidu, Mishra, & Satapathy, 2019;Moazenzadeh et al, 2018;Tabari, Marofi, & Sabziparvar, 2010). Several versions of ML models have been developed for evaporation modeling, including evolutionary computing, classical neural networks, kernel models, fuzzy logic, decision trees, deep learning, complementary wavelet-machine learning, and hybrid machine learning, among others (Danandeh Mehr et al, 2018;Fahimi, Yaseen, & El-shafie, 2016;Jing et al, 2019;Yaseen, Sulaiman, Deo, & Chau, 2019). The performance of these models and their hybrid combinations has been impressive in terms of prediction accuracy (Ghorbani, Deo, Karimi, Yaseen, & Terzi, 2017;Yaseen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, a number of investigations into the implementation of machine learning (ML) models for evaporation estimation have been conducted across different regions (Abghari, Ahmadi, Besharat, & Rezaverdinejad, 2012;Baydaroǧlu & Koçak, 2014;Di et al, 2019;Fallah-Mehdipour, Bozorg Haddad, & Mariño, 2013;Fotovatikhah, Herrera, Shamshirband, Ardabili, & Piran, 2018;Lu et al, 2018;Majhi, Naidu, Mishra, & Satapathy, 2019;Moazenzadeh et al, 2018;Tabari, Marofi, & Sabziparvar, 2010). Several versions of ML models have been developed for evaporation modeling, including evolutionary computing, classical neural networks, kernel models, fuzzy logic, decision trees, deep learning, complementary wavelet-machine learning, and hybrid machine learning, among others (Danandeh Mehr et al, 2018;Fahimi, Yaseen, & El-shafie, 2016;Jing et al, 2019;Yaseen, Sulaiman, Deo, & Chau, 2019). The performance of these models and their hybrid combinations has been impressive in terms of prediction accuracy (Ghorbani, Deo, Karimi, Yaseen, & Terzi, 2017;Yaseen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ML models such as the classification and regression tree (CART), the cascade correlation neural network (CCNN), gene expression programming (GEP), and the support vector machine (SVM) have achieved significant advancements in hydrologic modeling (Danandeh Mehr et al, 2018;Fahimi et al, 2016;Jing et al, 2019;Yaseen et al, 2019). These models can efficiently mimic and solve the stochasticity of different complex hydro-climatological processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed review of the applications of GP algorithm and some of its variants (e.g. gene expression programming) in the field of water resources research is provided by Danandeh Mehr et al (2018). The traditional/conventional GP algorithm involves several main steps as listed below (Koza 1992).…”
Section: Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean square error and root mean square error are widely used to measure fitness (e.g. Parasuraman et al 2007;Danandeh Mehr et al 2018) Model selection criterion for creating mating pool Basis on which models are selected for performing genetic operations such as mutation, crossover and replication. Roulette wheel selection, tournament selection and lexictour are examples for some of the selection criteria in use Probability of mutation Likelihood of replacing a sub-tree of a model (a part of a model) with a new sub-tree.…”
Section: Parallel Multi Population Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation