2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00120.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic quality of individuals impacts population dynamics

Abstract: Ample evidence exists that an increase in the inbreeding level of a population reduces the value of fitness components such as fecundity and survival. It does not follow, however, that these decreases in the components of fitness impact population dynamics in a way that increases extinction risk, because virtually all species produce far more offspring than can actually survive. We analyzed the effects of the genetic quality (mean fitness) of individuals on the population growth rate of seven natural populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
74
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultimately, in small and isolated populations inbreeding and genetic drift tend to decrease genetic variability Buskirk and Willi 2006). The extent to which genetic diversity is lost and characters displaced away from the selective optima are important for individual fitness as well as for population dynamics and viability (Buskirk and Willi 2006;Willi et al 2006;Hughes et al 2008;Vandewoestijne et al 2008;Reed et al 2007a). Despite the evolved behavioral and genetic mechanisms to avoid inbreeding, mating among relatives occurs regularly in many populations of wild species and it is therefore fundamental to understand the causes and patterns of inbreeding depression, the decline in trait values as a consequence of mating among relatives (Pusey and Wolf 1996;Crnokrak and Roff 1999;Hedrick and Kalinowski 2000;Frankham et al 2002;Keller and Waller 2002;O'Grady et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, in small and isolated populations inbreeding and genetic drift tend to decrease genetic variability Buskirk and Willi 2006). The extent to which genetic diversity is lost and characters displaced away from the selective optima are important for individual fitness as well as for population dynamics and viability (Buskirk and Willi 2006;Willi et al 2006;Hughes et al 2008;Vandewoestijne et al 2008;Reed et al 2007a). Despite the evolved behavioral and genetic mechanisms to avoid inbreeding, mating among relatives occurs regularly in many populations of wild species and it is therefore fundamental to understand the causes and patterns of inbreeding depression, the decline in trait values as a consequence of mating among relatives (Pusey and Wolf 1996;Crnokrak and Roff 1999;Hedrick and Kalinowski 2000;Frankham et al 2002;Keller and Waller 2002;O'Grady et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That inbreeding can potentially reduce population growth rates and increase extinction risks was demonstrated by influential studies of experimental plant populations (Newman & Pilson, 1997) and a butterfly metapopulation (Saccheri et al, 1998) and, more recently, by studies that demonstrate how experimentally restored immigration rapidly reverses negative population growth rates of inbred populations (Hogg et al, 2006). By demonstrating a link between population size (as a proxy of genetic variation) and population growth rates Reed, Nicholas & Stratton's (2007) study adds to the growing evidence that inbred populations may experience reduced population growth rates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The study of Saccheri et al (1998) fits this expectation, since the Glanville fritillary butterflies on Å land form part of a metapopulation that is regulated at the metapopulation level. The two spider species studied by Reed et al (2007), on the other hand, do not seem to fit the expectations: there was evidence for density dependence in survival. However, the populations of Rabidosa rabida exchange up to 1.5 migrants per generation, suggesting that they might form part of a metapopulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Maintenance of genetic diversity is of increasing importance in the preservation of threatened and endangered species (Lacy 1997;Haig 1998;Reed and Frankham 2003;Reed et al 2007). Lack of genetic diversity can lead to inbreeding depression (Frankham 1995), decreased immunity (O'Brien et al 1985), decreased reproductive performance (O'Brien et al 1985;Parker et al 1991) and eventual extinction (Frankham 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%