2019
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relatedness and the ratio of subpopulation‐common alleles are related in genomic prediction across structured subpopulations in maize

Abstract: Genomic prediction (GP), which could predict the breeding value of crop plants genotyped with molecular markers, has been carried out in multiple species. Prediction accuracy (PA) of GP depends on various factors, including genetic relatedness and genetic basis. In this study, we examined the rationale for the low PA of GP when the training and validation populations were distinct using 170 temperate inbred lines and 210 tropical and subtropical inbred lines, respectively. All inbred lines were evaluated for 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cross-validation scheme 1, just two of 10 traits, namely EH and KL showed slight improvement. We guess that TC and TM populations had different genetic backgrounds ( Li et al, 2019 ) and those QTL made different effect within two different populations. So the QTL effect was estimated biasedly when only one tester population as training population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For cross-validation scheme 1, just two of 10 traits, namely EH and KL showed slight improvement. We guess that TC and TM populations had different genetic backgrounds ( Li et al, 2019 ) and those QTL made different effect within two different populations. So the QTL effect was estimated biasedly when only one tester population as training population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower genetic relationship between training populations consisting of in-house developed lines and externally developed selection candidates has, however, a strong influence on the accuracy of genomic predictions (Clark et al, 2012;Ly et al, 2013;Pszczola et al, 2012). A larger genetic distance is usually associated with a lower prediction accuracy as has been observed in the prediction across germplasm groups in maize (Zea mays L.) (Guo et al, 2014;Li et al, 2019;Morais et al, 2020;Rio et al, 2019), sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] (Sapkota et al, 2020), and wheat (Bentley et al, 2014;Norman et al, 2018). This observation was likewise made when predicting germplasm developed outside the given breeding program with an in-house training population that did not cover the entire genetic space of the other breeding programs (Figure 2), even though all lines were adapted to Central European growing conditions and more closely related to each other in comparison to the mentioned maize and sorghum germplasm groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%