2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:gres.0000020856.77201.7d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relatedness in cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) germplasm collections as determined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this is an inferential criterion and it may not be so effective in quantifying or differentiating among populations. These results are in general agreement with the findings of Rao (1974) [11] , George et al (2005) [3] , Le et al (1998), Liu ShiBiao (2000) [7] , Samal et al (2002) [12] , Liu and Chen (2002) [6] and Mariguele and Silva (2010b) [9] .…”
Section: Cluster Wise Promising Genotypes (Qualitative Traits)supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this is an inferential criterion and it may not be so effective in quantifying or differentiating among populations. These results are in general agreement with the findings of Rao (1974) [11] , George et al (2005) [3] , Le et al (1998), Liu ShiBiao (2000) [7] , Samal et al (2002) [12] , Liu and Chen (2002) [6] and Mariguele and Silva (2010b) [9] .…”
Section: Cluster Wise Promising Genotypes (Qualitative Traits)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cluster analysis for qualitative traits showed that all genotypes were grouped into 8 clusters using non-hierarchical Euclidean cluster analysis (Table -2). For qualitative parameter, maximum number of genotypes were grouped into cluster VIII (14) followed by cluster III (12). The minimum number of genotypes was found in cluster V (3) followed by cluster I(4).…”
Section: Cluster Constellationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some used morphological markers (see references in Andrade et al 2019;Bionoset 2019), but genotyping with molecular markers such as isozymes, RAPDs, ISSRs, AFLP, microsatellites and ITS sequence data is now more usual, sometimes in combination with morphological descriptors; these studies have been carried out predominantly on material from India (e.g. Dhanaraj et al 2002;Rout et al 2002;Samal et al 2002;Archak et al 2003a, b;Samal et al 2003;Desai 2008;Archak et al 2009;Thimmappaiah et al 2009;Dashmohapatra et al 2014;Sethi 2015;Jena et al 2016), Brazil (e.g. Barros 1991;Cavalcanti and Wilkinson 2007;Pessoni 2007;Amaral et al 2017;Borges et al 2018), Nigeria (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the average similarity coefficients between selections and hybrids was very low, indicating hybridization. Samal et al (2003Samal et al ( , 2004 noted the genetic relationships of 25 varieties of cashew, collected from India on the basis of phenotypic characters and RAPD markers. They found 80 distinct DNA fragments with a range of 0.2-3.0 kb by using 11 selected random decamer primers.…”
Section: Molecular Diversity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%