DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-4679
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relationship of yield and fertility in dairy cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repeatability of fertility in first parity was higher than for second and third parities. Repeatability in second parity tended to be smaller than third parity, Hansen (1981) pointed out that the major cause of infertility is probably poor repro ductive management. Improved fertility may be favorably related to im proved milk production because virgin heifers that milk most in first lactations conceive easier, but stress of increased milk production may depress the genetic potential for improved fertility.…”
Section: Days Dry and Days Openmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Repeatability of fertility in first parity was higher than for second and third parities. Repeatability in second parity tended to be smaller than third parity, Hansen (1981) pointed out that the major cause of infertility is probably poor repro ductive management. Improved fertility may be favorably related to im proved milk production because virgin heifers that milk most in first lactations conceive easier, but stress of increased milk production may depress the genetic potential for improved fertility.…”
Section: Days Dry and Days Openmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Louca and Legates (1968) (Berger et al, 1981). Hansen (1981) studied fertility in the Holstein breed. In general, heritability of several measures of fertility in heifers tended to be slightly higher than for cows, Heritability of fertility ranged from 0 to ,03 for lactating cows.…”
Section: Days Dry and Days Openmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth data set was from the dissertation research of Les Hansen (Hansen (1981)), These data had been analyzed previously with Method III and also with single-trait REML (without relationships)…”
Section: Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset, 15,684 cows, also had information on their reproductive traits as heifers. Four hundred twenty-eight sires were included in the analysis, 353 of these because they had at least 10 daughters in the data and the remaining 75 because they were necessary for construction of A Although Hansen (1981) analyzed 21 traits, several of these were linearly confounded or nearly so, and this would give singular matrices and canputing…”
Section: Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameter estimates in column one of Table 21 The data were also analyzed as single traits (Table 22) using a univariate REML procedure in SAS (1985). (Harville, 1977;Hill and Thompson, 1978;Hill 1980 and1981;and Henderson, 1984a) all suggest including restraints on parameter estimates such that eigenvalues will be positive and estimated variances will be within the allowable parameter space. No one has yet compared estimates from a full multiple trait analysis with those obtained by a canonical transformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%