Genetic relationships among Iranian and exotic safflower using microsatellite markers

Bahmankar, Moslem; Nabati, D.A.; Dehdari, A

doi:10.1007/s12892-017-0001-0

Cited by 14 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ebrahimi et al (2016) determined genotypes with acceptable performance in safflower germplasm using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) biplot. The PCA biplot clearly clarified visual differentiation among the safflower genotypes based on SSR marker (Bahmankar et al, 2017). In the present study, genotypes OP17 (late maturing = high PC3) and OP18 (early maturing = low PC3) from OP population had relatively high performance in comparison with the other genotypes.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

Evaluating Selection Methods for Carthamus Interspecific Crosses under Different Water Conditions

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Core Ideas Wild relatives of safflower are suitable source of genes for improvement of cultivated species.Single plant selection is simple and results in genetic gain in safflower interspecific hybridization under both water stress and non‐stress conditions.Indirect selection is more efficient than direct selection for tolerance to water limited conditions in safflower interspecific crosses. Wild relatives of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) are a potential source of favorable genes for its further improvement through interspecific crosses. Therefore, two wild safflower species (C. palaestinus and C. oxyacanthus) were crossed with the cultivated counterpart in 2011. Three interspecific population progenies including C. palaestinus × C. tinctorius (PT), C. tinctorius × C. oxyacanthus (TO), and C. oxyacanthus × C. palaestinus (OP) were developed. Three selection methods including single plant selection (SPS), modified selected bulk (MSB) and modified bulk (MB) were applied at F3 generation in 2013. Selected lines were evaluated in F4 and F5 generations under water stress and non‐stress conditions during 2014 and 2015. The SPS and MSB methods resulted in higher genetic gain compared to MB under both moisture conditions. Even though, SPS and MSB were equally efficient in selecting better genotypes. SPS was much easier, less laborious, faster and cost‐effective method than MSB. A high percentage of agreement was observed between visual selection and selection based on actual yield only for SPS method by evaluating 2920 single plants. Capitulum diameter (CD) was a good criterion for visual selection of superior genotypes in the field condition under both moisture environments. The PT and TO lines that were produced by SPS and MSB methods showed slightly higher values for most measured traits when compared to the lines which were produced by MB selection method. The SPS‐derived lines were slightly earlier on maturity compared to the lines resulted from other selection methods.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

Evaluating Selection Methods for Carthamus Interspecific Crosses under Different Water Conditions

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the study of PCA in 20 safflower cultivars by Bahmankar et al . (2017), around 80% of the total variance in the data was explained by three components, where the contribution of the first, second and third components was 34, 32 and 14%, respectively. In their study, the first component was designated as yield and yield components (traits including head diameter, single plant yield, 1000-grain weight and the number of grains per head).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The second component as phenological traits components (days to 50% flowering, days to initiation of flowering and days to maturity). Also, the third component was nominated as the plant architecture component (number of heads per plant and height) (Bahmankar et al ., 2017). Based on the findings of Bahmankar et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctoriusL.) genotypes under semi-arid conditions

Ojaq

Mozafari

Jabbari

et al. 2020

Plant Genet. Resour.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To identify appropriate genotypes for breeding varieties suitable for semi-arid areas, yield components, as well as morphophonological traits of 127 safflower genotypes, were assessed at the Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Iran. Cluster analysis revealed four distinct groups. The largest group (third cluster) includes 48 genotypes with characteristics such as mostly yellow-coloured flowers, mostly thorny with few thistle genotypes, relatively early-flowering, relatively high number of heads and grains per plant, highest 1000-grain weight with the highest grain yields. In contrast, the smallest group (second cluster) contains 13 genotypes with characteristics such as yellow florets, semi-dwarf, thorny, moderately late-flowering, low number of heads per plant and number of grains per head, low 1000-grain weight, and low grain yield. Principal component analysis results showed that the three components accounted for 29.5, 15.9 and 11.1% of the total variation, respectively. Graphic representation of the biplots based on the first and second principal components showed that the experimental genotypes were classified into four groups. The results also indicated that stem diameter, the number of branches, heads per plant and grains per head had the highest correlation with the first component, and grain yield, flower colour, flowering initiation and plant height had the highest correlation with the second component. These traits can be considered as an appropriate index for the selection of elite safflower genotypes for breeding varieties suited to cultivation in semi-arid conditions.

show abstract

“…Nesse contexto, a avaliação da variabilidade genética com o uso de marcadores é primordial para exploração dos recursos genéticos em programas de melhoramento de plantas (Saadaoui et al, 2017). A diversidade genética pode ser avaliada usando diferentes marcadores (bioquímicos, morfológicos e moleculares), sendo que a variação genética no nível do DNA constitui uma excelente ferramenta para a obtenção de informações contidas no genoma de um indivíduo (Vieira et al, 2008;Bahmankar et al 2017).…”

unclassified

A cultura do Carthamus tinctorius L.: Principais usos e variabilidade genética

Oliveira

2021

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

O Carthamus tinctorius L. é uma das espécies mais antigas do mundo, é uma oleaginosa pertencente à família Asteraceae, cuja matéria-prima é destinada para diversos fins. A cultura tem atraído a atenção de pesquisadores e indústrias por possuir alta qualidade e quantidade de óleo, neste contexto o que torna importante a realização de estudos, principalmente no melhoramento genético, que auxilia na seleção de genótipos superiores. Diante disso, o presente trabalho objetivou-se desenvolver uma revisão de literatura sobre a cultura do cártamo, mostrando algumas informações sobre seu cultivo, principais usos e sobre a variabilidade genética da mesma. Através do estudo feito em artigos científicos, livros e periódicos pode-se familiarizar os leitores sobre a cultura do cártamo, pois ainda no Brasil é pouco estudada e informações principalmente sobre seu cultivo e produção ainda são escassas, mas alguns trabalhos apresentados mostra o potencial que o Brasil tem para o cultivo do cártamo, sendo necessários estudos de melhoramento genético para extrair o máximo potencial da espécie.

show abstract

Genetic relationships among Iranian and exotic safflower using microsatellite markers

Cited by 14 publications

References 19 publications

Evaluating Selection Methods for Carthamus Interspecific Crosses under Different Water Conditions

Evaluating Selection Methods for Carthamus Interspecific Crosses under Different Water Conditions

Evaluation of yield of safflower (Carthamus tinctoriusL.) genotypes under semi-arid conditions

A cultura do Carthamus tinctorius L.: Principais usos e variabilidade genética

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About