2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic relationships and population structure in three Italian Merino-derived sheep breeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
3
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
25
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The D ST value obtained from this study can be considered as an indicator of low genetic diversity between breeds. In this study, the obtained MNA value in terms of the breeds was found to be higher than in the literature (20,26,27). MNA was an indicator of within-breed diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…The D ST value obtained from this study can be considered as an indicator of low genetic diversity between breeds. In this study, the obtained MNA value in terms of the breeds was found to be higher than in the literature (20,26,27). MNA was an indicator of within-breed diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Considering the animals genotyped, the population parameters related to average number of alleles (9.25), H O (0.63), H E (0.72) and AR (6.95) were considerably higher when compared with results from the other populations in study. The population parameters observed in the present study were also higher than those observed in other sheep breeds, both locally adapted, and exotic, from Spain (Calvo et al, 2011), India (Arora et al, 2011), Italy (Lasagna et al, 2011), and Cuba (Álvarez et al, 2012). Tolone et al (2012) found very similar results when analyzing five Sicilian sheep breeds with 20 microsatellites (average of 10.95 alleles per locus for the native sheep Pinzirita).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The number of the effective alleles was in general much lower (1.19 ÷ 7.83, mean value 4.60), for the very low frequency of many alleles. Fourteen loci had PIC values exceeding 0.5 (0.59  0.86), which was indicated as the limit for considering a marker highly informative (Botstein et al, 1980), while ETH10 had a value of 0.17, so poorly contributing to the characterization of the within-breed variation, as shown for other sheep breeds also (Lasagna et al, 2011). Moreover, the FST value for ETH10 locus (Table 1) was also low, indicating a limited variability of this locus across-breed.…”
Section: Marker Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%