All living organisms have to protect the integrity of their genomes from a wide range of genotoxic stresses to which they are inevitably exposed. However, understanding of DNA repair in plants lags far behind such knowledge in bacteria, yeast, and mammals, partially as a result of the absence of efficient in vitro systems. Here, we report the experimental setup for an Arabidopsis in vitro repair synthesis assay. The repair of plasmid DNA treated with three different DNA-damaging agents, UV light, cisplatin, and methylene blue, after incubation with whole-cell extract was monitored. To validate the reliability of our assay, we analyzed the repair proficiency of plants depleted in AtRAD1 activity. The reduced repair of UV light-and cisplatin-damaged DNA confirmed the deficiency of these plants in nucleotide excision repair. Decreased repair of methylene blue-induced oxidative lesions, which are believed to be processed by the base excision repair machinery in mammalian cells, may indicate a possible involvement of AtRAD1 in the repair of oxidative damage. Differences in sensitivity to DNA polymerase inhibitors (aphidicolin and dideoxy TTP) between plant and human cell extracts were observed with this assay.
INTRODUCTIONThe genomes of all living organisms are constantly subjected to a wide range of genotoxic stresses induced by environmental factors (e.g., UV-B irradiation, bacterial and fungal toxins) as well as by the intermediate products of normal cellular metabolism (e.g., alkylating and oxidizing agents). These can lead to the formation of different types of DNA damage, the persistence of which can block DNA replication and transcription or cause cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (Britt, 1999;Lindahl and Wood, 1999). Incorrect repair can result in heritable point mutations or gross rearrangements such as deletions and insertions. To keep the integrity of their genomes, all organisms have evolved protective mechanisms of repair of a broad variety of DNA lesions. According to the mode of action, the substrate specificity, and the size of the excised DNA fragment, these pathways generally have been classified as direct repair, base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and mismatch repair (reviewed by Friedberg, 1996;Sancar, 1996;Wood, 1996;Lindahl and Wood, 1999). These mechanisms were first described in bacteria and later characterized extensively in yeast and mammals (Sancar, 1996;Laat et al., 1999;Le Page et al., 2000;Memisoglu and Samson, 2000). Unfortunately, with the exception of light-dependent reversion of UV light-induced pyrimidine dimers by photolyases, very little is known about DNA repair pathways in plants (reviewed by Vonarx et al., 1998; Britt, 1999).To study different types of DNA repair mechanisms in vitro, the formation of pathway-specific DNA lesions is required. For the study of NER, we chose the following DNAdamaging agents: UV-C and cis -diamminedichloroplatinum II (cisplatin). Additionally, methylene blue-treated DNA was used to distinguish the relative contributions of ...