1992
DOI: 10.2307/3563033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Secrets: Social Issues of Medical Screening in a Genetic Age

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is true, for example, in the area of employment. Although ethical and policy concerns arose regarding genetic testing in the context of the workplace (Rothstein, 1983(Rothstein, , 1994Draper, 1992;Marshall, 1992;Gostin, 1991;Rowinski, 1988;Wachbroit, 1988;Matthewman, 1984;Seifert, 1984;Murray, 1983), we are still waiting for a boom in systematic workplace testing.…”
Section: How Real Is Genetic Testing In the Workplace?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is true, for example, in the area of employment. Although ethical and policy concerns arose regarding genetic testing in the context of the workplace (Rothstein, 1983(Rothstein, , 1994Draper, 1992;Marshall, 1992;Gostin, 1991;Rowinski, 1988;Wachbroit, 1988;Matthewman, 1984;Seifert, 1984;Murray, 1983), we are still waiting for a boom in systematic workplace testing.…”
Section: How Real Is Genetic Testing In the Workplace?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Elaine Draper's analysis of the different perceptions of genetic screening and monitoring is revealing. She shows us that employers and employees have opposing views on the validity ofgenetic screening or monitoring because ofcompeting interests, which shape their perceptions of reality (Draper, 1986(Draper, , 1991(Draper, , 1992. Employers favor screening as a way of selecting employees, but they generally oppose monitoring.…”
Section: Testsfor Susceptibility To Occupational Hazardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, screening leads to a class of uninsurable people. These "undesirable" traits can follow people like scarlet letters handed down from generation to generation (Cavoukian & Tapscott, 1997;Draper, 1995). As genetic information accumulates, people will find themselves stigmatized, sometimes with dire consequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%