2004
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1309.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Selection for Susceptibility to Oral Tolerance Leads to a Profound Reduction of the Acute Inflammatory Response

Abstract: Strains of mice obtained by genetic selection to extremes of phenotype for susceptibility or resistance to oral tolerance were investigated for possible genetic correlations with acute inflammatory response using different models of inflammation. The results show a strong genetic association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, TR mice survival at the late phases after infection may be explained by their intense inflammatory response controlling the proliferation of the parasite during the initial stages of infection, allowing the mice to have a milder illness and survive to late periods of infection. This is corroborated by the fact that TR mice possess few CD4 + Foxp3 + cells, producing low anti-inflammatory cytokines levels which imply a high inflammatory potential [26] , [28] . TS mice, on the other hand, carry high numbers of regulatory T cells CD4 + Foxp3 + , thus, better regulating the inflammatory response [26] , [28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, TR mice survival at the late phases after infection may be explained by their intense inflammatory response controlling the proliferation of the parasite during the initial stages of infection, allowing the mice to have a milder illness and survive to late periods of infection. This is corroborated by the fact that TR mice possess few CD4 + Foxp3 + cells, producing low anti-inflammatory cytokines levels which imply a high inflammatory potential [26] , [28] . TS mice, on the other hand, carry high numbers of regulatory T cells CD4 + Foxp3 + , thus, better regulating the inflammatory response [26] , [28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…From the genetic point of view, the oral tolerance character is under polygenic control, and the resistant (TR mice) and susceptible (TS mice) lines are genetically homogeneous at the relevant loci for the selected character and heterogeneous in terms of background genes [24] . As far as the immunological perspective is concerned, TR mice are characterized by the development of strong Th1 and Th2 immune responses and higher acute inflammatory and allergic responses with low CD4+Foxp3+ Treg cell frequency producing insufficient IL-10 levels, in contrast to TS mice [26] , [27] , [28] . In previous studies, the TR and TS mice proved to be good models when infected with intracellular parasites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5a-c). Recent results show that the TS mice are lowinflammatory mice while TR and the F 1 mice are fivefold more inflammatory than TS mice 39 . This is suggestive of an association between OT and inflammation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treg cells are indispensable for homeostasis and regulation of the immune system, and there is also a suggestion that multiple signals could confer resistance to Treg cell suppression. 40 TR mice produce higher prostaglandin E2, intercellular adhesion moelcule, IL-1 and IL-12 levels and acute inflammatory responses 39 , probably as a consequence of low IL-10 levels, and these molecules can signal resistance to suppression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation