2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic stability and uniformity of Foeniculum vulgare Mill. regenerated plants through organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general belief is that multiplication involving a callus phase is more vulnerable for DNA damage during micropropagation [24,25]. For an example; in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq), 5% of somatic embryo-derived palms showed an abnormality that is called the 'mantled' phenotype [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general belief is that multiplication involving a callus phase is more vulnerable for DNA damage during micropropagation [24,25]. For an example; in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq), 5% of somatic embryo-derived palms showed an abnormality that is called the 'mantled' phenotype [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rout et al (1998) in ginger obtained monomorphic RAPD profiles for micropropagated plants regenerated from axillary bud proliferation. RAPD markers has recently been included in the in vitro studies to ascertain the genetic uniformity of tissue cultured plants, like Pandanus amaryllifolius (Gangopadhyay et al, 2004), Acacia mangium (Nanda et al,2004) and Foeniculum vulgare (Benniei, et al, 2004). ISSR techniques in case of pineapple to ascertain the genetic fidelity of plants produced through microshoots after storage in encapsulated form.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been applied for identification of variants among micropropagated plants including: phenotypic variation (Kancherla and Bhalla, 2003), karyotypic analysis of chromosomes (Bennici et al 2004), and biochemical analysis (Punja et al 2004). A major disadvantage of these techniques is the availability of only limited numbers of informative markers since the number of assays to detect them is relatively low.…”
Section: Plants Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%