2022
DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2022-0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic structure of reconstituted native Carpathian goat breed based on information from microsatellite markers

Abstract: The aim of the study was to evaluate the genetic structure of the reconstituted native Carpathian goat breed based on information from microsatellite markers. The study analysed of 14 microsatellite markers recommended by the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) for goats individual identification and parentage testing. Blood samples were taken from 249 Carpathian goats from 14 farms. All microsatellite markers deployed in this analysis showed sufficient polymorphism to assess genetic variation in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, their identification of two groups in the data is based on the use of Structure Harvester, which cannot assess whether one group (cluster) in the data is the optimal partition solution. As shown in the Kaweçka et al [51] delta likelihood plot, a clustering solution with only one cluster is more likely than any of the other partitions suggested by the authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, their identification of two groups in the data is based on the use of Structure Harvester, which cannot assess whether one group (cluster) in the data is the optimal partition solution. As shown in the Kaweçka et al [51] delta likelihood plot, a clustering solution with only one cluster is more likely than any of the other partitions suggested by the authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Our observed lack of population structure within Carpatina also reflected the results of the SNP array data by Colli et al [9], which shows that for the limited dataset they had (14 Carpatina individuals), the Admixture analyses did not render population structure within the breed. The only instance of some population structure reported for Carpatina is for Polish samples by Kaweçka et al [51], who analyzed 249 animals from 14 farms using microsatellites. In their study, they argued for the identification of two groups of animals with one group largely represented by animals from one farm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%