1996
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.8.530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Susceptibility to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract: More accurate risk estimation can define susceptible subgroups who might be targeted for intensive behavioral interventions, surveillance through screening, and enrollment in chemoprevention programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
84
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
84
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, G 2 response to X-rays cannot simply be regarded as a surrogate for response to bleomycin because, although breast cancer cases show enhanced X-ray sensitivity, they exhibit a normal bleomycin response (Hsu et al, 1989). Also, unlike our present observations on head and neck cancer patients, Cloos et al (1996) found a significant positive correlation between age and G 2 bleomycin sensitivity in 313 such patients.…”
Section: The G 2 Assaycontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, G 2 response to X-rays cannot simply be regarded as a surrogate for response to bleomycin because, although breast cancer cases show enhanced X-ray sensitivity, they exhibit a normal bleomycin response (Hsu et al, 1989). Also, unlike our present observations on head and neck cancer patients, Cloos et al (1996) found a significant positive correlation between age and G 2 bleomycin sensitivity in 313 such patients.…”
Section: The G 2 Assaycontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Enhanced sensitivity of G 2 lymphocytes of head and neck cancer patients to the chromosome-damaging agent, bleomycin, has been reported in several studies (references in Cloos et al, 1996). In a large case-control study of risk-factors for head and neck cancer, in which age, history of tobacco and alcohol usage, and bleomycin G 2 sensitivity were recorded, it was shown that the latter parameter is a biomarker of cancer susceptibility, since it modulates the risk from carcinogen exposure (Cloos et al, 1996).…”
Section: The G 2 Assaymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it has been speculated that exposure of the epithelium to carcinogens at a young age may reduce the period of latency in carcinogenesis. 21 Genetic susceptibility 22,23 may play a role in oral carcinogenesis together with exposure to external agents. In some patients, susceptibility to develop oral cancer may be explained by an impaired ability to repair damaged DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutagen sensitivity is not influenced by gender, tumor stage, or smoking and alcohol intake of the subjects and only slightly increases with age (4,10,11); it is considered to be an intrinsic factor, reflecting how an individual copes with DNA damage (12). In combination with carcinogenic exposure (smoking and alcohol intake), a mutagen hypersensitivity phenotype is associated with a greatly increased risk of developing HNSCC (13). Moreover, it was shown in a prospective patient study that mutagen hypersensitivity is related to the development of second primary tumors (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%