2013
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic susceptibility to methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity matters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended limits for hair-mercury concentrations vary. Even the lowest official limit, i.e., 1.0 µg/g hair used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [11], does not take into the impact of exposure misclassification [12] nor genetic predisposition to methylmercury toxicity [13]. An updated calculation suggests a more protective exposure limit of about 0.58 µg/g hair [12], and this limit was applied in an EU-wide comparison study [5] and in the present study as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended limits for hair-mercury concentrations vary. Even the lowest official limit, i.e., 1.0 µg/g hair used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [11], does not take into the impact of exposure misclassification [12] nor genetic predisposition to methylmercury toxicity [13]. An updated calculation suggests a more protective exposure limit of about 0.58 µg/g hair [12], and this limit was applied in an EU-wide comparison study [5] and in the present study as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to certain genetic mutations that can affect the retention of methylmercury in the body, specifically, the metabolism of glutathione and metallothioneins. However, the mechanisms involved in these relationships remain mostly unknown [38,39]. Hence, the importance of considering both environmental and occupational factors, and even personal factors (such as genetic traits) that could determine how exposure to mercury impacts an individuals’ health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, given the non-specific nature of the symptoms of mercury poisoning, the fact that this evaluation was not based on a medical history could have resulted in over-reporting, that is, not the result of exposure to mercury but rather to other conditions, such as cigarette smoking, alcohol, and exposure to dust and other substances that are present in mines [38]. Therefore, the identification of signs and symptoms should include a medical evaluation and the use of standardized instruments to reduce subjectivity at the time of reporting and diagnosing mercury poisoning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common mutations in certain genes seem to convey a greater risk of neurobehavioral deficits or symptoms, whether in adults working in dental clinics, school children exposed from new amalgam fillings, or children exposed in utero from the mother's seafood diet ( Julvez and Grandjean, 2013). Some of the gene variants may cause a greater retention of mercury compounds in the body, while others may cause decreased resistance to toxicity.…”
Section: Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%