2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4488(03)00185-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic trends for lamb weights in flocks of Egyptian Rahmani and Ossimi sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
21
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic trends for 3 months weight (34 g/year) and 6 months weight (28 g/year), were greater than the ones observed by Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep (5.3 and 5.2 g/year, respectively), and Lotfi et al (2011) in Arman sheep (7 and 8 g/year, respectively); however they were lower than that ones reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (55 and 72 g/year, respectively), Shaat et al (2004) in Rahmani sheep (92 and 135 g/year, respectively), and Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (82 and 76 g/year, respectively). The estimation of direct genetic trend for yearling weight (24 g/year) was lower than those reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (88 g/year) and Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep(84 g/year), while it was in accordance with the findings of Shrestha et al (1996) in Suffolk sheep (23 g/year) and it was higher than the ones reported by Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (16 g/year).…”
Section: Body Weight Traitscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The genetic trends for 3 months weight (34 g/year) and 6 months weight (28 g/year), were greater than the ones observed by Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep (5.3 and 5.2 g/year, respectively), and Lotfi et al (2011) in Arman sheep (7 and 8 g/year, respectively); however they were lower than that ones reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (55 and 72 g/year, respectively), Shaat et al (2004) in Rahmani sheep (92 and 135 g/year, respectively), and Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (82 and 76 g/year, respectively). The estimation of direct genetic trend for yearling weight (24 g/year) was lower than those reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (88 g/year) and Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep(84 g/year), while it was in accordance with the findings of Shrestha et al (1996) in Suffolk sheep (23 g/year) and it was higher than the ones reported by Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (16 g/year).…”
Section: Body Weight Traitscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For example, the additive genetic correlation is 0.60 between BW and WW, falling slightly to 0.31 between BW and W9. This result is expected because an autocorrelation would exist among the genetic and environmental effects associated with the measurements (Shaat et al 2004). A result which has been frequently reported by different researchers (e.g., Abegaz et al 2005, Miraei-Ashtiani et al 2007, Eskandarinasab et al 2010 is the negative phenotypic correlation between pre-and post-weaning daily gain in spite of positive genetic correlation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…A higher litter size allows more selection pressure on other economically important traits [22]. Because the heritability of LS is usually low, a selection on phenotype will be quite ineffective in improving litter size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%