1996
DOI: 10.4141/cjas96-004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic trends over 20 years of selection in the three synthetic Arcotts, Suffolk and Finnish Landrace sheep breeds. 1. Early growth traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The genetic trend for birth weight was irregular and not significant (the mean close to zero) and was in accordance with the findings of Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (0.7 g/year), Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (1 g/year), and Zishiri et al (2010) in Ile de France sheep(1 g/ year). However, estimates reported by Shrestha et al (1996) in Suffolk sheep(13 g/year) and Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep (5.5 g/ year) were higher than the estimates of the present study. Maternal effects had a significant effect on birth weight.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitscontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genetic trend for birth weight was irregular and not significant (the mean close to zero) and was in accordance with the findings of Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (0.7 g/year), Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (1 g/year), and Zishiri et al (2010) in Ile de France sheep(1 g/ year). However, estimates reported by Shrestha et al (1996) in Suffolk sheep(13 g/year) and Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep (5.5 g/ year) were higher than the estimates of the present study. Maternal effects had a significant effect on birth weight.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…The genetic trends for 3 months weight (34 g/year) and 6 months weight (28 g/year), were greater than the ones observed by Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep (5.3 and 5.2 g/year, respectively), and Lotfi et al (2011) in Arman sheep (7 and 8 g/year, respectively); however they were lower than that ones reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (55 and 72 g/year, respectively), Shaat et al (2004) in Rahmani sheep (92 and 135 g/year, respectively), and Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (82 and 76 g/year, respectively). The estimation of direct genetic trend for yearling weight (24 g/year) was lower than those reported by Hassani et al (2010) in Baluchi sheep (88 g/year) and Dorostkar et al (2011) in Moghani sheep(84 g/year), while it was in accordance with the findings of Shrestha et al (1996) in Suffolk sheep (23 g/year) and it was higher than the ones reported by Bahreini and Aslaminejad (2010) in Kermani sheep (16 g/year). The higher genetic trends for 3 month and 6 month weights, than other body weights, might be due to the relatively higher additive genetic variance in those traits.…”
Section: Body Weight Traitscontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…The positive development of BV for live weight at 12 weeks of age (from 1.07 kg in 1998 to 3.07 kg in 2003) in the fat-tailed Menz sheep breed was noted by Gizaw et al (2007). The same tendency of BV for growth performance traits at different ages has been described in various sheep breeds by Shrestha et al (1996), Shaat et al (2004), Mokhtari and Rashidi (2010), and Gholizadeh and GhafouriKesbi (2015). A genetic progress was also clear in the evaluated BVs of the Suffolk population in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Previous studies have described the genetic trends of different sheep populations; improvements in the sheep population genotypes was noted based on the increase in positive BVs during the observation period (Shrestha et al 1996;Hanford et al 2003;Gizaw et al 2007). Simm et al (2002) compared a selected Suffolk population with a control population in an attempt to describe the response to selection for lean growth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of a breeding program can be assessed by examining the actual change in breeding value expressed as a proportion of expected theoretical change of the breeding value mean for the trait under selection (Jurado et al 1994). Estimates of genetic trends for body weight of different sheep breeds have been reported by several authors (Shrestha et al 1996;Shaat et al 2004;Hanford et al 2005;Gizaw et al 2007;Bosso et al 2007;Mokhtari and Rashidi 2010). Such estimates are scarce for Moghani breed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%