2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic underpinnings of regional adiposity distribution in African Americans: Assessments from the Jackson Heart Study

Abstract: Background African ancestry individuals with comparable overall anthropometric measures to Europeans have lower abdominal adiposity. To explore the genetic underpinning of different adiposity patterns, we investigated whether genetic risk scores for well-studied adiposity phenotypes like body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) also predict other, less commonly measured adiposity measures in 2420 African American individuals from the Jackson Heart Study. Methods Polygenic risk scores (PRS) were cal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assessed genetic risk for obesity using BMI-PRS, which allows us to calculate each individual’s PRS from a well-powered, recent BMI GWAS [ 18 ]. BMI-PRS is reflective of a more general risk for obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities and correlates well with body fat percentage [ 18 , 46 , 47 ]. BMI-PRS was calculated using PRSice-2 [ 48 ] with pruning and thresholding of BMI GWAS summary statistics from an independent data sample ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics ) [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assessed genetic risk for obesity using BMI-PRS, which allows us to calculate each individual’s PRS from a well-powered, recent BMI GWAS [ 18 ]. BMI-PRS is reflective of a more general risk for obesity and cardiometabolic comorbidities and correlates well with body fat percentage [ 18 , 46 , 47 ]. BMI-PRS was calculated using PRSice-2 [ 48 ] with pruning and thresholding of BMI GWAS summary statistics from an independent data sample ( https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics ) [ 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF) ≥ 1%, a call rate ≥ 90%, and a Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) P-value > 10 − 6 were used for imputation to the 1000 Genomes reference panel. [33] The rst 10 principal components were estimated to represent global ancestry based on linkage-disequilibrium pruned set of SNPs with MAF > 0.05. [34] Outliers based on the principal component scores for global ancestry, sample swaps, duplicates, and one of each pair of monozygotic twins were excluded.…”
Section: Phenotype Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants with a mismatch between pedigree vs genetic sex were also removed. [33] Out of N = 47,101,766 imputed SNPs in the JHS, the present analysis included N = 9,360,683 SNPs with MAF > 0.05%, genotype call rate ≥ 90% and HWE P-value > 10 − 6 .…”
Section: Phenotype Ascertainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%