2018
DOI: 10.5958/0975-928x.2018.00082.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability and association studies for yield and its attributes in super-early pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (l.) Millsp.) Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of variance revealed significant differences for all the 30 traits under study (Table 1), suggesting exiatance of considerable genetic variation for yield, physiological and quality traits in studies super-early pigeonpea lines. These findings were in conformity with Ranjani et al (2018) andpushavalli et al (2018). Variability split into phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) sum ups the magnitude of variability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of variance revealed significant differences for all the 30 traits under study (Table 1), suggesting exiatance of considerable genetic variation for yield, physiological and quality traits in studies super-early pigeonpea lines. These findings were in conformity with Ranjani et al (2018) andpushavalli et al (2018). Variability split into phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) sum ups the magnitude of variability.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…. Higher GAM was reported byRanjani et al (2018) (plant height; number of pods per plant; seed yield per plant; number of branches per plant), pushpavalli et al (2017) (days to 50% flowering; plant height) and Verma et al (2018) (number of primary branches). Moderate GAM was testified by Pandey et al (2015) (number of primary branches; seeds per pod), Kesh et al (2017) (number of pods per plant) and Vanishree et al (2013) (seed yield per plant) and low GAM was documented for 100 seed weight bySharma et al (2012) andMallesh et al (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The association of pods per plant, secondary branches per plant, plant height and 100-seed weight with seed yield per plant was positive due to positive direct effects. Similar outcomes were also reported by Kothimbire et al (2016), Ram et al (2016), Kumar et al (2017), Ranjani et al (2018) and Singh et al (2019). Above results indicated that indirect selection for higher seed yield can be achieved through secondary branches per plant.…”
Section: Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysissupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In F 3:4 generation, pods per plant (0.818) exhibited the highest direct effect on seed yield per plant followed by 100-seed weight (0.285) and seeds per pod (0.195), While fruiting branches per plant (0.783), plant height (0.204), seeds per pod (0.186), days to 50 per cent flowering (0.131) and days to maturity (0.120) exerted indirect positive effect on grain yield per plant via pods per plant. Similar findings were reported by Thanki and Sawargaonkar (2010), Devi et al (2012), Chaithanya et al (2014), Vijayalakshmi et al (2013), Chandana et al (2014), Kothimbire et al (2016), Ram et al (2016), Kumar (2017) and Ranjani et al (2018) in pigeonpea. Hence, in both generations direct selection for the pods per plant and fruiting branches per plant could be effective in developing high yielding genotypes in pigeonpea.…”
Section: Association Studies (Correlation and Path Analysis)supporting
confidence: 83%