1990
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19900304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability and differentiation in red deer (Cervus elaphus L) of Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of polymorphism and heterozygosity are similar to those detected by Hartl et al (1990). Due to the increased sample sizes of individuals, however, a third rare allele at the Me-i locus was detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The values of polymorphism and heterozygosity are similar to those detected by Hartl et al (1990). Due to the increased sample sizes of individuals, however, a third rare allele at the Me-i locus was detected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It must be noted, however, that the extent of enzyme variation in the white-tailed deer is by far the highest among all deer species yet studied, both with respect to the number of loci polymorphic and the number of alleles found (see Hartl & Reimoser, 1988;Hartl et al, 1990, for reviews). A possible difference in the significance of enzyme polymorphism between r-(white-tailed) and Kstrategist (red) deer species has been discussed by Hartl & Reimoser (1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At finer spatial scales, female philopatry can result in clustering of related individuals and structuring of nuclear genotypes across continuous space (Coltman et al, 2003b;Nussey et al, 2005). Studies of red deer using nuclear DNA or protein markers have tended to find significant genetic structure between proximate populations of red deer in Europe, while failing to find evidence of any relationship between genetic and geographic distances between populations (Gyllensten et al, 1983;Hartl et al, 1990Hartl et al, , 1995. This is just the pattern expected among populations subject to physical isolation and regular introductions from diverse source populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunting may act to reduce spatial genetic structure if it is associated with disturbance to social structure leading to increased migration, or generates spatial differences in mating opportunities that may encourage dispersal (Harris et al, 2002). Anthropogenic activity may also isolate such populations either through deliberate enclosure of managed stocks (eg fenced populations) or habitat fragmentation and human constructions preventing natural dispersal (Hartl et al, 1990), leading to increased genetic differentiation through genetic drift and mutation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deer are among the few groups of large mammals which have been extensively studied by electrophoretic multilocus investigations to evaluate genetic diversity within and between populations and species (see Hartl and Reimoser, 1988;Hartl et al, 1990a for reviews). However, in contrast to the red deer (Bergmann, 1976;Kleymann, 1976a, b); Bergmann and Moser, 1985;Pemberton et al, 1988;Hartl et al, 1990aHartl et al, , 1991, the fallow deer (Pemberton and Smith, 1985;; Randi and Apollonio, 1988; Herzog, 1989), the moose (Ryman et al, 1977(Ryman et al, , 1980(Ryman et al, , 1981Reuterwall, 1980), the reindeer (R 0 ed et al, 1985;Røed, 1985aRøed, , b, 1986Røed, , 1987 and the white-tailed deer (Manlove et al, 1975(Manlove et al, , 1976Baccus et al, 1977;Johns et al, 1977;Ramsey et al, 1979;Chesser et al, 1982;Smith et al, 1983;Sheffield et al, 1985;Breshears et al, 1988) the factors influencing the amount and distribution of biochemical genetic variation in one of the most abundant European deer species, the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), are only poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%