2020
DOI: 10.34117/bjdv6n5-405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability and heritability of biofortified grain beans genotypes

Abstract: Bean is the sixth most produced crop in Brazil and it is a great source of protein and minerals in human food. It is possible to select promising genotypes to form biofortified cultivars for various mineral elements, allowing to improve the nutritional quality of the grains. In this study the mineralogical diversity composition in several bean genotypes was analyzed, focusing on the selection of promising parents in the formation of biofortified cultivars. The mineralogical composition of phosphorus, calcium, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimate of heritability for Fe concentration in the joint analysis was 69.5%, ranging from 58.5% for 'BRS Requinte' × G2358 to 68.7% for 'BRS Requinte' × 'Porto Real', which indicates a greater possibility of success in the selection of lines from the latter population. These values are similar to those found in several studies, but higher than those reported by Caproni et al (2020) and Queiroz et al (2021) and lower than those obtained by Mukamuhirwa et al (2015), Martins et al (2016), andZanotti et al (2020). For Zn concentration, the estimate of heritability was 53.1%, similar in the two populations (Table 2), being lower than most values reported in the literature (Mukamuhirwa et al, 2015;Martins et al, 2016; Pesq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimate of heritability for Fe concentration in the joint analysis was 69.5%, ranging from 58.5% for 'BRS Requinte' × G2358 to 68.7% for 'BRS Requinte' × 'Porto Real', which indicates a greater possibility of success in the selection of lines from the latter population. These values are similar to those found in several studies, but higher than those reported by Caproni et al (2020) and Queiroz et al (2021) and lower than those obtained by Mukamuhirwa et al (2015), Martins et al (2016), andZanotti et al (2020). For Zn concentration, the estimate of heritability was 53.1%, similar in the two populations (Table 2), being lower than most values reported in the literature (Mukamuhirwa et al, 2015;Martins et al, 2016; Pesq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Another important parameter is expected gain from selection. For Fe and Zn concentrations, estimates ranging from 2.7 to 37.9% and from 2.7 to 16.1%, respectively, have already been found (Martins et al, 2016;Zanotti et al, 2020;Queiroz et al, 2021). In most of these studies, the parameters were estimated for lines generated from crosses between parents with high contrasts for Fe and Zn concentrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simultaneous selection of grain quality and mineral concentration traits in common bean has recently emerged as a breeding program goal. Common bean genotypes with high grain quality (Silva et al, 2018) and high mineral concentration (Zanotti et al, 2020) were selected according to the rank-sum index based on data obtained from a single experiment. Using data from three experiments in a multiplicative index analysis, Ribeiro et al (2021) selected mineral-biofortified light-and dark-grained cultivars of common bean of high grain quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because direct selection allowed for a high genetic gain for traits analyzed individually, but caused undesirable changes in other important traits for selection (Jost et al, 2012;Maziero et al, 2015). Selection indices, in turn, allowed for the identification of superior common bean cultivars for several traits (Arns et al, 2018;Bertoldo et al, 2010;Dias et al, 2020;Gomes et al, 2018;Jost et al, 2012;Maziero et al, 2015;Ribeiro et al, 2019a;Silva et al, 2018;Zanotti et al, 2020), thereby enhancing the efficiency of breeding programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%