2017
DOI: 10.4236/ajps.2017.812209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability and Path Analysis Studies in Hybrid Maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.)

Abstract: The present study was carried out to access correlation coefficient, path analysis and genetic variability among twenty one locally developed maize hybrids for ten characters. Positive and significant genotypic, phenotypic correlation coefficient were recorded for yield with anthesis silking interval (r g = 1.00**, r p = 0.96**), cob diameter (r g = 0.99** and r p = 0.95**) and ear height (r g = 0.98** and r p = 0.94**). But days to 50% tasseling had moderate but significant positive correlation at both phenot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Five traits such as 1000 seed weight, yield/ plant, days to heading, spike length and yield/ plot showed higher heritability associated with low genetic advance indicated nonadditive gene action. It was also shown by Begum et al (2016) and Matin et al (2017). But the character grain/ spike had high Hb value along with high GA suggesting additive gene effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five traits such as 1000 seed weight, yield/ plant, days to heading, spike length and yield/ plot showed higher heritability associated with low genetic advance indicated nonadditive gene action. It was also shown by Begum et al (2016) and Matin et al (2017). But the character grain/ spike had high Hb value along with high GA suggesting additive gene effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This was an indication of indirect selection. Direct negative effect on yield also mentioned in some parameters of maize in an study of Matin et al (2017), which indicated the effectiveness of indirect selection.…”
Section: Path Coefficient Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several maize breeders have used this method for identifying secondary traits as opposed to the use of genetic correlation (Barros et al, 2010;Chinnadurai and Pothraj, 2011;Begum et al, 2016;Baretta et al, 2016, Talabi et al, 2017Matin et al, 2017). However, the use of path coefficient analysis to identify and validate secondary traits for selection of improved grain yield under water stress and non-stress condition remains a relevant research focus in maize breeding Edmeades, 1993, 1996;Bänziger and Lafitte, 1997;Badu-Apraku et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The path analysis will help to create a good image of the interconnection of the seed yield with other contributory characters, and the direct and indirect effects of them. Matin et al (2017) studied 10-character access path analysis with 21 locally developed maize hybrids. The most important positive influence on yield was the silking interval (0.79) of anthesis, followed by the diameter of cob (0.31), length of cob (0.31), and plant height (0.04), whereas some other characters, such as dayto-day tasseling (−0.12), days to silking (−1.78), ear height (−1.16), and days to maturity (−0.64), had an indirect negative impact on yields, showing indirect selection effect.…”
Section: Path Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%