2007
DOI: 10.3923/jbs.2007.765.770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability in Cassava as it Influences Storage Root Yield in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results obtained in the present study, with = 20.93%, were observed for other character in cassava, such as fresh root yield (Farias Neto et al, 2013). In contrast, above 50% was observed for root and stem productive traits in cassava (Aina et al, 2007;Oliveira et al, 2015).…”
Section: Estimates Of Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar results obtained in the present study, with = 20.93%, were observed for other character in cassava, such as fresh root yield (Farias Neto et al, 2013). In contrast, above 50% was observed for root and stem productive traits in cassava (Aina et al, 2007;Oliveira et al, 2015).…”
Section: Estimates Of Genetic Parameterssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Storage root yield is the central trait in all cassava breeding programmes (Aina et al 2007; Ntawuruhunga & Dixon 2010) and has been reported to be genetically correlated with storage root number (SRN), harvest index (HI), storage root size and canopy size (Ntawuruhunga & Dixon 2010). Yield improvement can be achieved through exploiting the genetic variability within cassava germplasm (Aina et al 2007). High levels of genetic variability are required amongst parental germplasm to facilitate an effective long-term plant breeding programme and also to justify the need for selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research has been directed towards identifying the optimum harvest time for cassava based on peak storage root yield (Aina et al 2007; Amenorpe et al 2007; Suja et al 2010; Bassey & Harry 2013); however, different harvest dates are reported for different genotypes and regions. Therefore, optimum harvest time is dependent on the genetic background of test genotypes, growing conditions and rate of storage root bulking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that this component reflects stem diameter, harvest index, petiole length, tuber diameter, plant dry matter content and tuber yield of each genotype. Aina et al, (2007), Raghu et al, (2007 Asare et al, (2011) andBabu Rao et al, (2016) also reported the first two principal components accounting maximum for total variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%