2015
DOI: 10.1080/02571862.2015.1014435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata(L.) Walp.) genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
57
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
16
57
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Height to first pod, fresh pod pigmentation and fresh pod color were related to PC2 (17.32%). Similar proportions of phenotypic diversity explained by the first two axes have been reported previously for various cowpea traits by Ahamed et al 37 and Gerrano et al, 38 and for fresh pod traits of Turkish common bean genotypes. 39 PCA classified all cv.…”
Section: Classification Of Landraces Based On Fresh Pod Traitssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Height to first pod, fresh pod pigmentation and fresh pod color were related to PC2 (17.32%). Similar proportions of phenotypic diversity explained by the first two axes have been reported previously for various cowpea traits by Ahamed et al 37 and Gerrano et al, 38 and for fresh pod traits of Turkish common bean genotypes. 39 PCA classified all cv.…”
Section: Classification Of Landraces Based On Fresh Pod Traitssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Days to pod bearing, as well as days to harvest from sowing, were also negatively correlated with all the other fresh pod traits studied. Given the different requirements among landraces for photoperiod and temperature, the selection of cowpea genotypes regarding their photosensitivity and appropriate sowing time based on the different agro‐climatic conditions of each region could contribute to increase fresh pod yield. Quantitative trait loci clusters for pod traits, such as length and width, have been found in cowpea and other legumes, indicating additive and epistatic effects among these important agronomic traits.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal components analysis is important for the breeder because it allows identifying characteristics that contribute with significant genetic variability among genotypes and selecting agronomically desirable parents for hybridizations (Gerrano et al, 2015) .The results obtained from the analysis revealed that the four first components explain 80.66% of the total variability and have eigenvalues higher than 1.0 (Table 3), very similar to those reported by Gerrano et al (2015) and Adewale et al (2011). The first principal component retains 33.66% of the total variability, due to the width and length of the seed and weight of 100 seeds, characters that contrast in greater degree with the number of pods per plant, length of the peduncle, days to first mature pod and days to harvest, that is to say, when increasing the first three, the four second ones decrease and, vice versa, a performance similar to that reported by Jonah et al (2014) in Vigna subterranea.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysis (Pca)supporting
confidence: 77%
“…The analysis of variance revealed significant differences among the genotypes for the ten quantitative characters indicating the presence of adequate variability, which can be exploited through selection. Different reports indicated there is substantial phenotypic variability among cowpea varieties for different characters (Animasaun et al, 2015;Cobbinah et al, 2011;Gerrano et al, 2015;Lazaridi et al, 2017;Menssen et al, 2017;Molosiwa et al, 2016).…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%