1968
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183x000800050018x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability in Forage Yield, Crude Protein Percentage, and Palatability in Reed Canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L.1

Abstract: Twenty clonal lines of reed canarygrass, Phalaris arundinacea L., and their topcross progenies were evaluated under two clipping management systems designed primarily to compare forage harvested in the fall after two‐month and three‐month regrowth periods. Objectives were to investigate the genetic variability in forage yield, crude protein percentage, and palatability to rabbits and sheep.The differences among the clonal and progeny lines in forage yield and crude protein percentage were similar under the two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerably more information in the perennial grass literature about forage yield than seed yield, confirming that, in most of cases, the most important breeding objective is to improve the forage-yielding capacity of the crop. The estimates of broad-sense heritability for dry matter yield (48%) in the present study were generally lower than those previously reported for F. arundinacea (Burton andDeVane 1953, Hovin et al 1976), F. pratensis (Aastveit and Aastveit 1990) and P. arundinacea (Asay et al 1968;Faris 1970); however, a number of these authors had not removed the genotypeenvironment interaction variances from their estimates. In this study, the narrow-sense estimate of 33% from variance components for dry matter yield in the open-pollinated progeny test was similar to the estimates of other authors (B. inermis, McDonald et al 1952, Tan et al 1978F.…”
Section: Genetic Variation and Heritabilitycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…There is considerably more information in the perennial grass literature about forage yield than seed yield, confirming that, in most of cases, the most important breeding objective is to improve the forage-yielding capacity of the crop. The estimates of broad-sense heritability for dry matter yield (48%) in the present study were generally lower than those previously reported for F. arundinacea (Burton andDeVane 1953, Hovin et al 1976), F. pratensis (Aastveit and Aastveit 1990) and P. arundinacea (Asay et al 1968;Faris 1970); however, a number of these authors had not removed the genotypeenvironment interaction variances from their estimates. In this study, the narrow-sense estimate of 33% from variance components for dry matter yield in the open-pollinated progeny test was similar to the estimates of other authors (B. inermis, McDonald et al 1952, Tan et al 1978F.…”
Section: Genetic Variation and Heritabilitycontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…As there was no positive correlation between CP and agromorphological traits, it is not possible to improve forage quality through indirect selection. However, unlike some studies in grasses reporting negative correlation between CP and forage yield (Asay et al, 1968;Tan et al, 1978;Vogel et al, 1981;Vogel et al, 1993;Berg and Hill 1983;Araghi et al, 2014), in orchardgrass the possibility of improving forage yield and quality together exists.…”
Section: General Combining Abilitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…differences in palatability among genotypes, lines, or strains have been demonstrated in Phalaris spp. (Roe & Mottershead 1962) and P. arundinacea (Asay et al 1968). Seasonal changes in palatability occur in P. aquatica and P. arundinacea (Oram et al 1985).…”
Section: Plant Characteristics Affecting Voluntary Intakementioning
confidence: 99%