2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-019-09985-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability in the parasitic fly, Sarcophaga villeneuveana, in south-western Europe and Morocco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cochlicella acuta in Australia belong to a genetic lineage derived from southern Iberia (Spain and Portugal) and Morocco [28]. Two common S. villeneuveana CO1 haplotypes from southern Portugal, Spain and Morocco are not known to occur in Australian flies, which were sourced from the Montpellier region in France [29]. Due to different geographic sources of the fly and snail hosts, it was argued that a genetic mismatch may have contributed to low parasitism success of S. villeneuveana in Australia [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cochlicella acuta in Australia belong to a genetic lineage derived from southern Iberia (Spain and Portugal) and Morocco [28]. Two common S. villeneuveana CO1 haplotypes from southern Portugal, Spain and Morocco are not known to occur in Australian flies, which were sourced from the Montpellier region in France [29]. Due to different geographic sources of the fly and snail hosts, it was argued that a genetic mismatch may have contributed to low parasitism success of S. villeneuveana in Australia [28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the biological control agent, S. villeneuveana, on populations of invasive conical snails in South Australia after 20 years is limited. Factors inhibiting success may include single-fly releases with relatively few individuals, variation in abundance and distribution of host snails, cryptic snail aestivation habitats that are inaccessible to flies, a lack of floral resources for flies in agricultural areas, the use of broad-spectrum insecticides on farms that are harmful to flies, possible genetic or ecological differences between host and parasitoid populations [28,29], or a loss of genetic variability due to laboratory inbreeding [37,38]. However, evidence of substantially higher parasitism in localised environments with favourable habitat for the fly indicates the potential to improve biological control of both conical snail species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…acuta in its native range showed that there are three main mitochondrial lineages and that the C . acuta that was introduced in Australia is part of the same lineage encompassing Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula (Jourdan et al, 2020). However, S .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While S. villeneuveana established successfully in Australia, parasitism remains low (Thomann et al, 2020). A molecular study of C. acuta in its native range showed that there are three main mitochondrial lineages and that the C. acuta that was introduced in Australia is part of the same lineage encompassing Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula (Jourdan et al, 2020).…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly two decades later, it was determined that biocontrol using French S. villeneuveana had failed [ 107 ]. Genetic studies of Australian populations of C. acuta , were undertaken, and it was determined that the Australian snails were most closely related to source populations in Morocco and the Iberian Peninsula, not France [ 106 ], and studies were begun to determine whether S. villeneuveana from the Iberian Peninsula or Morocco might be more effective in controlling C. acuta [ 106 , 107 , 108 ], and Moroccan S. villeneuveana have been brought to Australia for further testing and potential release [ 109 ]. The initial uncertainty as to the identity of the sarcophagids under study highlights the fact that, as was the case with Euglandina spp., even modern biological controls that are touted as not being ‘classic biocontrol’ are still based on inadequate evaluation of the biology and even identity of appropriate predators and parasitoids.…”
Section: Current Best Practices Sarcophagid Flies and Phasmarhabditismentioning
confidence: 99%