2016
DOI: 10.5958/0975-928x.2016.00044.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variability of Sweet Potato on yield and yield related traits at werer Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
3
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings indicated that the characters with the high and moderate heritability and genetic advance can be considered for direct selection for improvement. These results are in agreement with the results of Engida et al, (2006), Shashikanth et al, (2008) Madawal et al, (2015, Demelie and Aragao (2016) and Badu et al, (2017) in sweet potato.…”
Section: Heritabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The above findings indicated that the characters with the high and moderate heritability and genetic advance can be considered for direct selection for improvement. These results are in agreement with the results of Engida et al, (2006), Shashikanth et al, (2008) Madawal et al, (2015, Demelie and Aragao (2016) and Badu et al, (2017) in sweet potato.…”
Section: Heritabilitysupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result means that the increase in the value of the characters will increase the root yield. The previous studies also showed similar results, where the root yield was positively correlated with the total number of roots (Afuape et al 2011;Demelie and Aragaw 2015;Egbe et al 2012;Mekonnen et al 2015), root diameter (Gedamu et al 2010;Jha 2012), harvest index (Jha 2012;Rahajeng and Rahayuningsih 2015;Tirkey 2011;Tsegaye et al 2006). According to Mekonnen et al (2015), the significant and the positive correlation indicates that characters significantly correlated with root yields can be used as an indicator of the adaptability of sweetpotatoes in the study area to increase root yields (as indirect selection tool), so that the sweetpotato breeding program with the purpose of increasing root yields should use these characters as a selection criteria.…”
Section: Correlation and Path Analysissupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The slight difference in value between PCV and GCV shows that the influence of genetic factors is more dominant than the influence of environmental factors. The research of Demelie and Aragaw (2016) and Rahajeng and Indiati (2018) also showed the same results, PCV values were greater than GCV with a slight difference in values. If the value of PCV and GCV has a significant difference, it means that environmental factors have a high influence.…”
Section: Estimation Of Genetic Variance Componentsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using PKBT-STAT 1.0 program. Genetic parameter analysis (genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation, heritability, and genetic advances) was performed according to Syukur et al (2009) and Demelie and Aragaw (2016). The deviation of genetic variance was used to determine the criteria of genetic variability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%