1983
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05542.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variability Within and Among Populations of the Black‐tailed Prairie Dog

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
35
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
9
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the Stanovoi mountain range, separating Southern Jakutia and Chara, must limit gene flow to a large extent. Additionally, the estimates of genetic subdivision among wood lemming populations at Id/i-i resemble FST values detected for other rodent species (Wright, 1978;Chesser, 1983;Navajias-Navarro & Britton-Davidian, 1989;Patton & Smith, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the Stanovoi mountain range, separating Southern Jakutia and Chara, must limit gene flow to a large extent. Additionally, the estimates of genetic subdivision among wood lemming populations at Id/i-i resemble FST values detected for other rodent species (Wright, 1978;Chesser, 1983;Navajias-Navarro & Britton-Davidian, 1989;Patton & Smith, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Protein electrophoresis has been widely used to describe genetic structure within populations of rodent species while there are only a few estimations of population differentiation at the macrogeographical level (Wright, 1978;Chesser, 1983; Navajias-Navarro & Britton- Davidian, 1989;Patton & Smith, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are within the range of those reported for different rodent populations, like that of Thomomys bottae, with FST from 0.049 to 0.066 (Patton & Feder, 1981), Cynomys ludovicianus, with FST from 0.045 to 0.065 (Chesser, 1983) and different colonies of Marmota flaviventris, with FST of 0.07 (Schwartz & Armitage, 1980). In these three species, it is possible to define the actual breeding units.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…For example, genetic drift can produce significant changes in the genetic pool of a population in a relatively short time, when populations are subdivided into small breeding units (Wright, 1980). In the variety of small mammals, mostly rodents, studied to date, genetic differentiation among subpopulations over short geographic distances appears to be the rule (Selander, 1970;Patton & Yang, 1977;Wright, 1978;Smith et al, 1978;Patton & Feder, 1981;Chesser, 1983). Geographic barriers, strict social systems, or low mobility of individuals, are usually factors that contribute to the existence of small breeding units, which may differ in genic frequencies according to migration rate and local selective pressures. Calomys laucha is a cricetid rodent that inhabits fields dedicated to agriculture in the temperate climate zone of Argentina known as 'humid pampa'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final analysis (F-statistics and clustering) we included data from previous investigations from our laboratory (Karakousis & Triantaphyllidis, 1988. The Fstatistics were performed according to Weir & Cockerham's (1984) procedure and the differences of FST values among populations for each locus were tested with the f-test, x2 = 2NFST(k-1) with (k-1)(s--1) degrees of freedom, where N is the total sample size, k is the number of alleles for the locus and s is the number of subpopulations (Chesser, 1983). The deviation of F1 from zero was tested by x2= NF12, where N is the total sample size (Hedrick, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%