2018
DOI: 10.1086/696023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Variation and Structure in an Endemic Island Oak,Quercus tomentella, and Mainland Canyon Oak,Quercus chrysolepis

Abstract: Premise of research. Quercus tomentella is a tree species endemic to the California Channel Islands and Isla Guadalupe. Given its distribution across six widely separated islands, significant genetic structure would be expected, despite the propensity of oaks for long-distance pollen dispersal. In comparison, its close mainland relative, Quercus chrysolepis, has a more continuous range and fewer barriers to gene flow.Methodology. We sampled Q. tomentella from all the islands in its range (N p 345) and Q. chrys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we restrict the analysis to diversity inventories based on microsatellites, then a general picture of high heterozygosity (> 0.7) with numerous rare alleles emerges. This is the case not only for species with a broad distribution ( Q. macrocarpa (Craft & Ashley, ); Q. rubra (Lind‐Riehl & Gailing, ; Alexander & Woeste, ); Quercus candicans, Quercus castanea and Quercus crassifolia (Oyama et al , ); Q. petraea and Q. robur (Mariette et al , ; Neophytou et al , ); Q. acutissima (Zhang et al , ); and Quercus mongolica (Zeng et al , )), but also for species with much narrower ranges ( Quercus hinckelyi (Backs et al , ); Quercus engelmannii (Ortego et al , ); Quercus tomentella (Ashley et al , ); Quercus alnifolia (Neophytou et al , ); and Quercus austrocochinchinensis (An et al , )). Whole‐genome sequencing results have recently confirmed marker estimates, highlighting a strikingly high degree of nucleotide diversity (π values of 0.0114 (Plomion et al , ), and one SNP every 23 bp (Leroy et al , ).…”
Section: Microevolution In Oaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we restrict the analysis to diversity inventories based on microsatellites, then a general picture of high heterozygosity (> 0.7) with numerous rare alleles emerges. This is the case not only for species with a broad distribution ( Q. macrocarpa (Craft & Ashley, ); Q. rubra (Lind‐Riehl & Gailing, ; Alexander & Woeste, ); Quercus candicans, Quercus castanea and Quercus crassifolia (Oyama et al , ); Q. petraea and Q. robur (Mariette et al , ; Neophytou et al , ); Q. acutissima (Zhang et al , ); and Quercus mongolica (Zeng et al , )), but also for species with much narrower ranges ( Quercus hinckelyi (Backs et al , ); Quercus engelmannii (Ortego et al , ); Quercus tomentella (Ashley et al , ); Quercus alnifolia (Neophytou et al , ); and Quercus austrocochinchinensis (An et al , )). Whole‐genome sequencing results have recently confirmed marker estimates, highlighting a strikingly high degree of nucleotide diversity (π values of 0.0114 (Plomion et al , ), and one SNP every 23 bp (Leroy et al , ).…”
Section: Microevolution In Oaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole‐genome sequencing results have recently confirmed marker estimates, highlighting a strikingly high degree of nucleotide diversity (π values of 0.0114 (Plomion et al , ), and one SNP every 23 bp (Leroy et al , ). Despite potential constraints due to either natural vegetative reproduction (Ainsworth et al , ; Valbuena‐Carabana et al , ; Backs et al , ; Ashley et al , ) or scattered distributions at the edges of the main range (Ohsawa et al , ; Marsico et al , ; Ortego et al , ), the erosion of diversity has been limited.…”
Section: Microevolution In Oaksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oaks ( Quercus : Fagaceae) have been frequently used to study the geographic distribution of genetic diversity from a historical point of view in the Nearctic and Neotropical regions (Ashley, Backs, Kindsvater, & Abraham, 2018; Cavender‐Bares et al, 2015; Gugger & Cavender‐Bares, 2013; Magni, Ducousso, Caron, Petit, & Kremer, 2005; Marsico, Hellmann, & Romero‐Severson, 2009; Rodríguez‐Correa, Oyama, Quesada, Fuchs, & González‐Rodríguez, 2018; Rodríguez‐Gómez, Oyama, & Ochoa‐Orozco, 2018). Recently, several authors described a well‐founded diversification scenario for American oaks (Hipp et al, 2014, 2018, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic diversity, as measured by number of alleles, heterozygosity, and allelic richness, was high for the wild plants, and there was no evidence of inbreeding. Despite the dangerously low remaining number of Q. hinckleyi, the species harbors allelic diversity and heterozygosity comparable to that of more widespread oaks (Ashley et al 2015;Pohjanmies et al 2016;Ashley et al 2018;DiPietro et al 2020). However, the genetic analysis also revealed a high level of clonal growth, including identical clones separated by up to 30 m. Clonal identification showed that the number of unique genotypes in the remaining natural population was only 123 (of 204 plants sampled), indicating that the in situ population is even smaller than previously thought, at least in terms of effective population size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%