1994
DOI: 10.14214/sf.a9177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation in English oak (Quercus robur) in Finland.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dotted lines group populations in three main regions (I, II, III) according to their geographical proximity, with the exception of population 11 (Monte Acuto) (G STn = 0.11 and G STc = 0.34) among French stands using nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers, respectively. Our results were roughly consistent with previous investigations based on allozyme variation in other forest tree species with scattered distribution and small population size, revealing a much higher genetic differentiation than the ones observed in Sorbus torminalis (Prat et al 1992;Gibson and Wheelwright 1995;Machon et al 1997;Mattila and Vakkari 1997). A pronounced differentiation among populations was also reported in earlier studies, based on RAPD markers, for animal-dispersed tree species with a scattered occurrence, such as Prunus mahaleb and Taxus baccata (Jordano and Godoy 2000;Hilfiker et al 2004b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Dotted lines group populations in three main regions (I, II, III) according to their geographical proximity, with the exception of population 11 (Monte Acuto) (G STn = 0.11 and G STc = 0.34) among French stands using nuclear and chloroplast DNA markers, respectively. Our results were roughly consistent with previous investigations based on allozyme variation in other forest tree species with scattered distribution and small population size, revealing a much higher genetic differentiation than the ones observed in Sorbus torminalis (Prat et al 1992;Gibson and Wheelwright 1995;Machon et al 1997;Mattila and Vakkari 1997). A pronounced differentiation among populations was also reported in earlier studies, based on RAPD markers, for animal-dispersed tree species with a scattered occurrence, such as Prunus mahaleb and Taxus baccata (Jordano and Godoy 2000;Hilfiker et al 2004b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The expected heterozygosities for Danish Q. petraea and Q. robur resemble those found in other investigations (Kremer et al 1991, Mü ller-Starck et al 1993, Zanetto et al 1994; however, direct comparisons should be made with care owing to varying systems and methods (Mü llerStarck et al 1992). An investigation on Finnish stands of Q. robur showed a smaller diversity of 0.188 (Mattila et al 1994). As in the present study, only small differences in gene diversity have been recorded between Q. petraea and Q. robur.…”
Section: Genetic Di×ersitycontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…The use of chloroplast DNA haplotypes makes discrimination between female and male migrants easy. In species with a scattered distribution among-population variation may be revealed, as was the case for Ulmus laevis Finnish populations (Mattila and Vakkari 1997). However, this kind of among-population differentiation is probably not adaptive, rather it may be attributed to genetic drift in small marginal populations.…”
Section: Markersmentioning
confidence: 94%