2016
DOI: 10.2989/20702620.2016.1183095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation in growth and wood-quality traits ofCorymbia citriodorasubsp.variegataacross three sites in south-east Queensland, Australia

Abstract: Ten growth or wood-quality traits were assessed in three nearby Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata (CCV) open-pollinated family-within-provenance trials (18 provenances represented by a total of 374 families) to provide information for the development of a breeding program targeting both pulp and solid-wood products. Growth traits (diameter at breast high over bark [DBH], height and conical volume) were assessed at 3 and 7 years of age. Wood-quality traits (density [DEN], Kraft pulp yield [KPY], modulus of e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theĥ 2 a estimates, related to the component of inheritance that is effectively transmitted to the next generation (Falconer and Mackay 1996;Bernardo 2010), were classified as moderate (0:15\ĥ 2 a 0:50) to high (0:50\ĥ 2 a ) (Resende 2002) for all the traits evaluated (Table 3) with estimates for CCV higher than those for CCC. Hung et al (2016) observed estimates ofĥ 2 a for CCV at age 3 years of 0.34 ± 0.03 and 0.42 ± 0.04 for DBH and H, respectively, which was similar to what we found in CCC and lower than what we observed for the same species. Though Hung et al (2016) postulated that their results may be biased due to the use of one-third rather than 1/2.5 for the coefficient of relationship among families and the heavy thinning in some trials, their assumption is similar to our assumption of 1/3.3.…”
Section: Genetic Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theĥ 2 a estimates, related to the component of inheritance that is effectively transmitted to the next generation (Falconer and Mackay 1996;Bernardo 2010), were classified as moderate (0:15\ĥ 2 a 0:50) to high (0:50\ĥ 2 a ) (Resende 2002) for all the traits evaluated (Table 3) with estimates for CCV higher than those for CCC. Hung et al (2016) observed estimates ofĥ 2 a for CCV at age 3 years of 0.34 ± 0.03 and 0.42 ± 0.04 for DBH and H, respectively, which was similar to what we found in CCC and lower than what we observed for the same species. Though Hung et al (2016) postulated that their results may be biased due to the use of one-third rather than 1/2.5 for the coefficient of relationship among families and the heavy thinning in some trials, their assumption is similar to our assumption of 1/3.3.…”
Section: Genetic Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Hung et al (2016) observed estimates ofĥ 2 a for CCV at age 3 years of 0.34 ± 0.03 and 0.42 ± 0.04 for DBH and H, respectively, which was similar to what we found in CCC and lower than what we observed for the same species. Though Hung et al (2016) postulated that their results may be biased due to the use of one-third rather than 1/2.5 for the coefficient of relationship among families and the heavy thinning in some trials, their assumption is similar to our assumption of 1/3.3. Moreover, is probable that our own estimates of additive variance are inflated, due to (1) confounding of genotype-byenvironment interaction (GxE) variance with additive variance, due to the single-site trials that do not allow estimation of GxE and (2) lack of pedigree ns = not significant; * = significant to 5% of error probability; ** = significant to 1% of error probability information including provenance of ancestral origin information for the families.…”
Section: Genetic Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Table4). This genetic relationship is consistent with studies in other species (C. citriodora rg = −0.96 ± 0.01,Hung et al (2016)), confirming MFA as a major contributor to wood stiffness along with wood density. While wood density and MFA appear to be genetically independent (Table4), both are highly significantly correlated with MOE, consistent with their independent contributions to wood stiffness.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…A few studies have reported genetic correlations between MFA and KPY. For example Hung et al (2016) similarly reported a moderate to strong negative genetic correlation at the family (−0.77 ± 0.05) and provenance (−0.93 ± 0.04) levels in Corymbia citriodora. As MFA is negatively correlated with wood stiffness, the present finding is also consistent with a significant positive genetic correlation between KPY and wood stiffness related traits (i.e.…”
Section: Genetic Correlations With Kpymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fact that the basic density and the microfibril angle do not differ significantly between the sources may be an indication that these properties may be less controlled by genetic and environmental factors than the volumetric shrinkage. However, heritability estimates for wood density and MFA are considered more moderate (Hung et al 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%