1993
DOI: 10.1139/g93-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variation in paw preference (handedness) in the mouse

Abstract: Lateralization of paw preference in laboratory mice in a single-paw reaching task has been used as a model system for left- and right-hand usage. Given a set number of paw reaches for food from a centrally placed food tube, an individual mouse will exhibit a reliable number of left and right paw reaches. Within any single inbred strain, there are approximately equal numbers of left-pawed and right-pawed mice. Nevertheless, significant strain differences have been reported for the degree of lateralization of pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This decrease in lateralization was observed for the three DAT strains that are normally contrasted for their degree of paw preference. Indeed, WT mice of the B6-DAT strain were found to be more strongly lateralized than the D2-DAT, as previously described for the B6 and D2 inbred strains of mice (Biddle et al, 1993;Signore et al, 1991a). In addition, the DAT-F 1 hybrid strain was similar to its highly lateralized B6 parental strain, supporting a dominant model for the higher degree of lateralization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This decrease in lateralization was observed for the three DAT strains that are normally contrasted for their degree of paw preference. Indeed, WT mice of the B6-DAT strain were found to be more strongly lateralized than the D2-DAT, as previously described for the B6 and D2 inbred strains of mice (Biddle et al, 1993;Signore et al, 1991a). In addition, the DAT-F 1 hybrid strain was similar to its highly lateralized B6 parental strain, supporting a dominant model for the higher degree of lateralization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…These progenitor strains were chosen because they are among the most genetically, physiologically, and behaviorally contrasted inbred strains (Atchley and Fitch, 1991; PuglisiAllegra and Cabib, 1997). In terms of handedness, B6 have been described as strongly lateralized, whereas D2 were found to be ambidextrous (Biddle et al, 1993;Signore et al, 1991a). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, although Lmo4 expression in mouse cortex was moderately asymmetrical in every individual brain tested so far, it was not consistently lateralized to the right or left side. This may relate to behavioral and anatomical studies in mice, in which sensory-motor asymmetries, like paw preference, are observed in individual mice, but are not biased on a population level to either the right or left hemisphere as is hand preference in humans (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The differences in mice and humans suggest the intriguing possibility that paw preference in rodents might reflect an early, perhaps stochastic, developmental asymmetry that is established perinatally, prior to paw usage, implying a transcriptional asymmetry that is not consistently lateralized to the left and right.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Be that as it may, as Collins himself has pointed out, the usefulness of the mouse handedness model is not predicated on the similarity of its distribution of handedness types to those of other species [8]. Biddle's group [13] has also recently reported strain differences in RPE scores and our own independent reanalysis of the Signore et al data supports both a leftward population bias and strain differences in RPE 2 . The Collins test has been a very popular method for determining paw preference in mice; several groups of workers have employed this procedure to investigate the influences of various factors on mouse paw preference [14][15][16][17][18][19]11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%