2012
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2012.569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic variations in miR-27a gene decrease mature miR-27a level and reduce gastric cancer susceptibility

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding RNAs that function as post-transcriptional regulators of tumor oncogenes and suppressors. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in miRNA genes are a novel class of genetic variations in the human genome that are currently being identified and investigated in human cancers. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether SNPs in the miR-27a gene affect miR-27a expression and alter susceptibility to gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a case-control population study and the a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used by ten studies; real-time PCR (qPCR) was conducted by six studies; PCR with confronting two-pair primers (PCR-CTPP) was adopted by one study; and a single study applied locus-specific PCR (LS-PCR) for genotyping. Genotype distributions in the control groups were consistent with HWE, except for those in three studies (Okubo et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2014;Pu et al, 2014). The NOS scores of the selected studies ranged from six to nine stars, which were moderately high.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used by ten studies; real-time PCR (qPCR) was conducted by six studies; PCR with confronting two-pair primers (PCR-CTPP) was adopted by one study; and a single study applied locus-specific PCR (LS-PCR) for genotyping. Genotype distributions in the control groups were consistent with HWE, except for those in three studies (Okubo et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2014;Pu et al, 2014). The NOS scores of the selected studies ranged from six to nine stars, which were moderately high.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…According to the inclusion criteria, 49 articles were excluded. Eventually, 19 case-control studies from 16 articles (Okubo et al, 2010;Peng et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2010;Zeng et al, 2010;Hishida et al, 2011;Ahn et al, 2012;Ma and Zheng, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012b;Zhou et al, 2012a,b;Wang et al, 2013b;Wu et al, 2013b;Yang et al, 2014;Dikeakos et al, 2014;Kupcinskas et al, 2014;Pu et al, 2014) were included in our meta-analysis, with 8285 patients and 10,716 controls in total. The details of the selection process are presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, great caution should be used in interpreting the findings from the three preclinical studies investigating the effect of rs11671784 on miR-27a expression. 20,22,23 The allele frequency of rs11671784 in this study, in the previous study by Amstutz et al and according to the 1000 genomes project, is around 0.010-0.020 in European and American populations, and was reported to be 0.000 in Chinese populations. 21,26 Remarkably, the allele frequencies reported in the three preclinical investigations, all performed in China, were much higher, between 0.30 and 0.50.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Three preclinical investigations have shown that the rs11671784 T allele is associated with reduced miR-27a expression, as opposed to the increase in expression caused by rs895819. 20,22,23 This appears to contradict an increased risk of toxicity in carriers of this variant, as a reduction in miR27a expression is expected to lead to higher DPD activity. However, great caution should be used in interpreting the findings from the three preclinical studies investigating the effect of rs11671784 on miR-27a expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation