2003
DOI: 10.3354/meps247303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically different Atlantic herring Clupea harengus spawning waves

Abstract: Putative spawning waves of Atlantic herring Clupea harengus were collected from 4 locations and genetically compared using 9 microsatellite loci. Shelf-scale (100s km) spatial differences were measured (max F ST = 0.01, p < 0.001) and 1 sub-annual temporal difference (F ST = 0.0058, p = 0.001) was revealed between spawning fish (predominantly comprising the same year-class) collected, 6 d apart, from the same location (Devastation Shoal, coastal Nova Scotia). Herring in the second spawning collection at Devast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in spawning time and place have also been implicated in temporal genetic differentiation (McPherson et al 2003). Similarly to other notothenioids for which the onset of spawning exhibits latitudinal variation, such as Dissostichus eleginoides (Laptikhovsky et al 2006) and the channichthyid Champsocephalus gunnari (Everson et al 2001), C. aceratus populations inhabiting the southerly distribution range (South Shetlands) spawn from February to May, whereas northerly (South Georgia) spawning starts 1 or 2 mo earlier (Kock & Kellermann 1991).…”
Section: Recruitment and Reproductive Success Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in spawning time and place have also been implicated in temporal genetic differentiation (McPherson et al 2003). Similarly to other notothenioids for which the onset of spawning exhibits latitudinal variation, such as Dissostichus eleginoides (Laptikhovsky et al 2006) and the channichthyid Champsocephalus gunnari (Everson et al 2001), C. aceratus populations inhabiting the southerly distribution range (South Shetlands) spawn from February to May, whereas northerly (South Georgia) spawning starts 1 or 2 mo earlier (Kock & Kellermann 1991).…”
Section: Recruitment and Reproductive Success Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors, a spawning school could represent an interbreeding unit. The genetic homogeneity and differentiation of the spawning school could be supported by mechanisms such as spawning waves (McPherson et al, 2003;Jorgensen et al, 2005) or homing (Ryman and Utter, 1987), which would promote the segregation of different genetic populations during the reproductive season.…”
Section: Genetic Variation and Population Structuring On Migratory Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different groups that spawn at a same location but at different times are known as spawning waves (McPherson et al, 2003;Jorgensen et al 2005).…”
Section: Genetic Variation and Population Structuring On Migratory Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temporal or spatial Whalund effect), as well as possible local inbreeding. The occurrence of a spatial and temporal Whalund effect is one of the classical hypotheses put forward to explain the genetic patchiness (Johnson & Black 1982 in the marine environment, a phenomenon increasingly reported both for invertebrates (Jolly et al 2003, Juinio-Menez et al 2003, Casu et al 2005, Andrade & Solferini 2007, Arnaud-Haond et al 2008) and fish (Doherty et al 1995, Exadactylos et al 1998, Planes et al 2002, McPherson et al 2003, Selkoe et al 2006, Burford & Larson 2007, GonzalezWanguemert et al 2007, and which is likely to generate significant and large F IS values. In the present study, a possible origin of genetic patchiness, involving admixture of seeds from different origins, and a possible low number of trees at the origin of those events of recruitment (bottleneck effect), are also supported by the lack of trends in the evolution of allelic richness when analyzed in each 5 yr cohort rather than in cumulative age classes (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%