In this regard, bioinspired drug delivery systems based on living cells and extracellular vesicles (EVs) have attracted much attention in the early 21st century. The crucial advantages of these natural vehicles for brain delivery include high biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and cytotoxicity profiles, intrinsic biological activity, and the ability to cross biological barriers including the blood brain barrier (BBB). Moreover, immunocytes, in particular, monocytes/ macrophages and EVs released by these cells selectively accumulate in therapeutically relevant numbers in regions of inflammation and neurodegeneration and can deliver therapeutics to inflamed brain. [8,13,15] We reported earlier [7,[9][10][11][12]20,22] multiple lines of evidence for therapeutic efficacy of cell-based drug delivery systems, including significant neuroprotection, decreased brain inflammation, and improved locomotor functions in mouse models of Parkinson's disease (PD). Furthermore, our previous investigations demonstrated a remarkable ability of macrophage derived EVs to communicate with recipient cells [23][24][25] in inflamed mouse brain tissues via the lymphocyte function associated antigen-1 (LFA1)/intercellular Discovery of novel drug delivery systems to the brain remains a key task for successful treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. Herein, the biodistribution of immunocyte-based carriers, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and monocyte-derived EVs are investigated in adult rhesus macaques using longitudinal PET/MRI imaging. 64 Cu-labeled drug carriers are introduced via different routes of administration: intraperitoneal (IP), intravenous (IV), or intrathecal (IT) injection. Whole body PET/MRI (or PET/ CT) images are acquired at 1, 24, and 48 h post injection of 64 Cu-labeled drug carriers, and standardized uptake values (SUV mean and SUV max ) in the main organs are estimated. The brain retention for both types of carriers increases based on route of administration: IP < IV < IT. Importantly, a single IT injection of PBMCs produces higher brain retention compared to IT injection of EVs. In contrast, EVs show superior brain accumulation compared to the cells when administered via IP and IV routes, respectively. Finally, a comprehensive chemistry panel of blood samples demonstrates no cytotoxic effects of either carrier. Overall, living cells and EVs have a great potential to be used for drug delivery to the brain. When identifying the ideal drug carrier, the route of administration could make big differences in CNS drug delivery.