2000
DOI: 10.1051/animres:2000120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically modified organisms: consequences for ruminant health and nutrition

Abstract: -Many of the plants eaten by farmed ruminants are capable of being genetically modified, and may in the future be modified for nutritional, agronomic or industrial purposes. Techniques are also becoming available for genetic modification of silage and ruminal bacteria. Those working in agricultural biotechnology have a clear responsibility to detect and avoid any unintended or undesirable consequences of such modifications, whether direct or indirect, upon the animal, the consumer and the environment. One of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, it may be preferable to carry out the manipulation and reintroduction simultaneously on more than one bacterial strain. In the case of rumen bacteria, manipulations have been aimed at improving plant fibre degradation, and ultimately animal production [reviewed by e. g. 55,56]. Despite the fact that ruminants and their bacterial symbionts have coevolved over thousands of years, recent changes in farming practices mean that the resident bacterial population is no longer optimal to provide maximal energy release from the feed provided.…”
Section: Conjugative Transposons As Tools For Genetic Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it may be preferable to carry out the manipulation and reintroduction simultaneously on more than one bacterial strain. In the case of rumen bacteria, manipulations have been aimed at improving plant fibre degradation, and ultimately animal production [reviewed by e. g. 55,56]. Despite the fact that ruminants and their bacterial symbionts have coevolved over thousands of years, recent changes in farming practices mean that the resident bacterial population is no longer optimal to provide maximal energy release from the feed provided.…”
Section: Conjugative Transposons As Tools For Genetic Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several of the plant species used as ingredients of animal feeds have been subject to genetic modifications (GM) operated by recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) technology. Among the crops concerned by GM-induced tolerance to various herbicides or resistance to insects or viruses (21), soybean and rapeseed are currently used to a large extent as protein sources in concentrates fed to ruminants in countries in Europe. Table III shows the situation in 2001 in France regarding the ingredients incorporated into manufactured concentrates fed to dairy cows and beef cattle.…”
Section: Protein Sources For Ruminant Feedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many transgenic farm animals have been produced on a routine basis. Examples are transgenic fish that grows 2-3 times faster than normal and is cold-tolerant was produced by microinjection of desired DNA into oocytes, transgenic cattle, sheep, swine and rabbits produced by microinjection of desirable gene into zygote to produce faster-growing animals with better meat quality, transgenic goats and sheep which produce human milk because of the transfer of human genes into such animals, and transgenic chicken which grow faster and are tolerant to viral diseases because of the transfer of growth hormone gene as well as a gene that increases viral resistance based on interference (Bazer, 1992;Fox, 1992;Forano and Flind, 2000).…”
Section: Sustainable Use Of Bioresourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%