SciVee 2010
DOI: 10.4016/18510.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetically Programmable Pathogen Sense and Destroy

Abstract: Twenty five percent of all the deaths worldwide are caused by infectious diseases. They are also the biggest cause of mortality among children under five years of age. Among them diarrheal diseases alone cause as many deaths as AIDS or TB and malaria combined. Also up to 80% of traveler's diarrhea is bacterial in nature. Vibrio cholerae (cholera), Salmonella spp (typhoid fever), Shigella spp (shigellosis) and a variety of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains are among the principle bacterial agents that c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system described herein is sufficiently modular that the trigger and memory circuits could be reengineered to respond to chemical signatures of inflammation, cancer, parasites, or environmental toxins in the gut. In combination with additional genetic circuits, such as the recent search-and-destroy circuits (36)(37)(38), cells could be designed with the memory element described here to diagnose a specific pathogen, and emit a therapeutic. Together, these approaches may allow construction of a new class of engineered probiotic bacteria that serve as benign and transient diagnostics and therapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system described herein is sufficiently modular that the trigger and memory circuits could be reengineered to respond to chemical signatures of inflammation, cancer, parasites, or environmental toxins in the gut. In combination with additional genetic circuits, such as the recent search-and-destroy circuits (36)(37)(38), cells could be designed with the memory element described here to diagnose a specific pathogen, and emit a therapeutic. Together, these approaches may allow construction of a new class of engineered probiotic bacteria that serve as benign and transient diagnostics and therapeutics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include combined domains of pyocins S1 and AP41 (Sano et al, 1993a) and a pyocin S5/S2 chimer (Elfarash et al, 2014). In addition, active pyocin/colicin hybrids with domains from pyocin S3 and colicin E3 (Gupta et al, 2013; see Potential applications for S-type pyocins) and with domains from pyocins S1 or S2 and colicins E2 or E3 have been engineered (Kageyama et al, 1996). Pyocin S5 and PaeM that do not require translocation to the cytoplasm for killing, exhibit a different domain architecture with the translocation domain preceding the receptor-binding domain (Barreteau et al, 2009;Elfarash et al, 2014).…”
Section: Domain Architecture Of S-type Pyocinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When reaching a threshold intracellular concentration of E7 lysis protein, E. coli cells will burst, causing the release of the pyocin into the environment and killing P. aeruginosa (Saeidi et al, 2011). In a similar system, E. coli sentinels were armed with a chimeric pyocin, constituted of the receptor and translocation domain of pyocin S3 and the killing and immunity domain of colicin E3, under the control of the P las promoter (Gupta et al, 2013). The target detection module provides LasR, specifically interacting with the P. aeruginosa autoinducer.…”
Section: Potential Applications For S-type Pyocinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular nature of our design can accommodate further optimization and extension by equipping the bacteria with effector genes of interest. These include effectors to target tumor cells (Anderson et al, 2006;Zhang et al, 2010), to kill bacterial pathogens (Saeidi et al, 2011;Gupta et al, 2013;Hwang et al, 2014), or to degrade environmental pollutants (Furukawa, 2000). For such applications, the programmed safeguard provides an intrinsic mechanism to prevent unintended proliferation of such engineered bacteria, a major safety concern that limits their broad applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%