1943
DOI: 10.1093/genetics/28.2.162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetics of Natural Populations Ix. Temporal Changes in the Composition of Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura

Abstract: Camp, a t about 4300 feet. The stations within a locality are from 2 0 0 yards to 2+ miles apart, and the localities IO to 13 miles apart. Because of the differences in the elevation and other factors, the population density in Andreas is highest in March-April and lowest in summer. The population density a t Pinon is greatest in spring and autumn, and a t Keen in early summer. No flies can be collected a t Pinon and Keen in winter, and a t Andreas the flies are very rare in late summer.Five gene arrangements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seasonal change in Drosophila inversion frequencies is a long-standing topic of study ( Dobzhansky 1943 ). We therefore asked whether inversion frequencies varied seasonally between our fall and spring samples ( supplementary table S5, Supplementary Material online).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonal change in Drosophila inversion frequencies is a long-standing topic of study ( Dobzhansky 1943 ). We therefore asked whether inversion frequencies varied seasonally between our fall and spring samples ( supplementary table S5, Supplementary Material online).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, theory suggests that linked selection can cause the spread of an initially rare inversion when it captures a locally adaptive haplotype, protects it from recombination load and/or maladaptive gene flow from neighboring populations, and then ‘hitchhikes’ with it to high frequency; alternatively, a new inversion might be favored by direct positive selection when the breakpoints of the inversion fortuitously induce a beneficial mutation (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1973; Charlesworth 1974; Kirkpatrick and Barton 2006; Kirkpatrick 2010; Guerrero et al 2012; Charlesworth and Barton 2018; Kapun and Flatt 2019; Durmaz et al 2020; Mackintosh et al 2022). Indeed, beginning with Dobzhansky’s seminal observations in Drosophila pseudoobscura (Dobzhansky 1943, 1947, 1948, 1950; Wright and Dobzhansky 1946), many inversion polymorphisms subject to spatially and/or temporally varying selection have been identified, from plants to humans (Krimbas and Powell 1992; Hoffmann et al 2004; Stefansson et al 2005; Hoffmann and Rieseberg 2008; Lowry and Willis 2010; Kapun et al 2016a; Wellenreuther and Bernatchez 2018; Faria et al 2019; Kapun and Flatt 2019; Machado et al 2021; Lange et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaptation can occur at remarkably short timescales in natural populations, leading to drastic changes in genotype frequencies and phenotypes over a few generations only (Buffalo and Coop, 2019). This rapid pace of adaptation has motivated the use of temporal data to understand neutral (Prout, 1954; Wallace, 1956; Nei and Tajima, 1981; Pollak, 1983; Mueller et al, 1985b; Waples, 1989; Wang and Whitlock, 2003) and under-selection genetic evolution over time (Dobzhansky, 1943; Fisher and Ford, 1947; Kettlewell, 1958, 1961; Mueller et al, 1985a). However, such time series studies remain rare compared to the amount of work focusing on one contemporary sample to trace back its genetic history (Buffalo and Coop, 2019, 2020; Pavinato et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%