2006
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GeneTools – application for functional annotation and statistical hypothesis testing

Abstract: Background: Modern biology has shifted from "one gene" approaches to methods for genomic-scale analysis like microarray technology, which allow simultaneous measurement of thousands of genes. This has created a need for tools facilitating interpretation of biological data in "batch" mode. However, such tools often leave the investigator with large volumes of apparently unorganized information. To meet this interpretation challenge, gene-set, or cluster testing has become a popular analytical tool. Many gene-se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The table displays the enrichment of immune-related GO terms following infection of myd88 −/− (Mu) and wild-type (Wt) embryos with E. tarda (Et) or S. typhimurium (St). GO-term enrichment in the gene lists upregulated by infection was determined by master-target statistical testing using eGOn (Beisvag et al, 2006) with the Danio rerio UniGene build number 124 as background. The numbers of genes associated with each GO term and the P -values for enrichment are indicated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The table displays the enrichment of immune-related GO terms following infection of myd88 −/− (Mu) and wild-type (Wt) embryos with E. tarda (Et) or S. typhimurium (St). GO-term enrichment in the gene lists upregulated by infection was determined by master-target statistical testing using eGOn (Beisvag et al, 2006) with the Danio rerio UniGene build number 124 as background. The numbers of genes associated with each GO term and the P -values for enrichment are indicated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For heat map construction, the fold change values of significant probes representing the same gene were averaged. GO analysis was performed using the GeneTools eGOn v2.0 web-based gene ontology analysis software (http://www.genetools.microarray.ntnu.no) (Beisvag et al, 2006). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene ontology classification of these 35 differentially expressed genes was performed by using GeneBank accession number, Operon ID, and annotation tools database available on-line [28,29]. The gene sets were classified according to their putative main molecular function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes were considered differentially expressed as a result of DDC overexpression if normalized values from induced LNCaP-DDC cells were at least 2-fold greater or 2-fold less than those from the control cells (LNCaP-DDC-Dox, LNCaP-pDEST- Dox, and LNCaP-pDEST+Dox). Functional classifications were based on gene ontology (GO) annotation obtained through the GeneTools database [28,29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…microarray.ntnu.no) at the level of the UniGene clusters (D. rerio UniGene build no. 105) [20]. Overlapping genes of Tag-Seq, microarray and RNA-Seq data sets were functionally annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA), Entrez Gene, and HomoloGene databases and the AmiGO (http://amigo.geneontology.org/cgi-bin/ amigo/go.cgi) gene ontology database.…”
Section: Gene Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%