2013
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genital incarceration: an unusual case report

Abstract: Incarceration or strangulation of the penis is a rare clinical situation that requires emergent urologic management to prevent potentially devastating outcomes. Many different techniques have been described in the literature to remove genital foreign objects, but there is no universally successful technique. We present an unusual and challenging case involving incarceration of both the penis and scrotum by multiple metallic rings that required operative removal using an orthopedic high-speed drill.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These burns have been prevented or mitigated through the use of cold sterile fluids for irrigation, placing malleable retractors beneath the metallic objects, and the use of a high precision Midas-Rex pneumatic drill with metal cutting carbide attached. 5 However iatrogenic thermal burns become inevitable when one is dealing with a very hard and thick metallic nut, tightly constricting and strangulating the penis after having been placed on the flaccid penis 12 hours earlier. A compounding factor is when the only available tool for removal is an electrically driven circular grinder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These burns have been prevented or mitigated through the use of cold sterile fluids for irrigation, placing malleable retractors beneath the metallic objects, and the use of a high precision Midas-Rex pneumatic drill with metal cutting carbide attached. 5 However iatrogenic thermal burns become inevitable when one is dealing with a very hard and thick metallic nut, tightly constricting and strangulating the penis after having been placed on the flaccid penis 12 hours earlier. A compounding factor is when the only available tool for removal is an electrically driven circular grinder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The presence of these constricting devices results in a potential penile compartment syndrome with an initial obstruction of both venous and lymphatic outflow distal to the device followed by arterial inflow obstruction, ultimately leading to tissue ischemia and necrosis. 3 The choice of object and the resulting clinical consequences are widely variable and therefore the treatment options have to be individualized as per the clinical scenario. Consequences of penile strangulation can be urethro-cutaneous fistula, penile skin necrosis, penile fibrosis, and complete gangrene of penis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each case is unique because of the variety of constricting objects. Sometimes, multidisciplinary and even non-medical technical assistance, such as the hospital engineering department and fire department, is essential 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%