2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genital Sensations in Persistent Genital Arousal Disorder: A Case for an Overarching Nosology of Genitopelvic Dysesthesias?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 However, as PGAD is not a named sexual dysfunction category, no diagnostic criteria are listed in the ICD-11 classification. 42 At the ISSWSH PGAD consensus meeting in 2019, experts discussed a possible name change for the following reasons: (1) the term PGAD was descriptive rather than medical; (2) Pukall et al recommended that PGAD be considered a genito-pelvic dysesthesia characterized by distressing arousal, that is classified according to its primary sensation (eg, arousal) and that this overarching framework could include other distinct (but often overlapping) sensations (ie, pain, vulvodynia, itch) 43 ; and (3) there are patients who have a distressing genital itch and/or pain symptoms 10,14,43 with or without genital symptoms of arousal, and a change in terminology would acknowledge the overlap among these dysesthesia symptoms. Further supporting the change in nomenclature is that common neural pathways (spinothalamic and/or spinoreticular tracts) convey genital sensations of arousal and orgasm, as well as dysesthesias such as itch and pain.…”
Section: Nomenclature Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 However, as PGAD is not a named sexual dysfunction category, no diagnostic criteria are listed in the ICD-11 classification. 42 At the ISSWSH PGAD consensus meeting in 2019, experts discussed a possible name change for the following reasons: (1) the term PGAD was descriptive rather than medical; (2) Pukall et al recommended that PGAD be considered a genito-pelvic dysesthesia characterized by distressing arousal, that is classified according to its primary sensation (eg, arousal) and that this overarching framework could include other distinct (but often overlapping) sensations (ie, pain, vulvodynia, itch) 43 ; and (3) there are patients who have a distressing genital itch and/or pain symptoms 10,14,43 with or without genital symptoms of arousal, and a change in terminology would acknowledge the overlap among these dysesthesia symptoms. Further supporting the change in nomenclature is that common neural pathways (spinothalamic and/or spinoreticular tracts) convey genital sensations of arousal and orgasm, as well as dysesthesias such as itch and pain.…”
Section: Nomenclature Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Early symptoms of PGAD/GPD may include genital awareness that is noticed but non-aversive. More intense dysesthesia symptoms (eg, genital/perineal pain, 10,15,22,55 itch, 43 clitorodynia, 66,67 vulvodynia, 51,68,69 vestibulodynia, 70 dyspareunia, 68 interstitial cystitis, 71 bladder/bowel dysfunction, 22,48,71,72 rectal, 72 leg, and/or back pain, 22 or restless legs), 48,73,74 with possible spontaneous orgasms/ejaculations, may represent a progression of the condition. Protracted neuropathy could result in damage to the nerves or nerve roots, changing the symptoms from "hyperfunction" (eg, genital arousal, pain, and/or itch) to "hypofunction" (eg, genital numbness, anorgasmia, and/or anejaculation).…”
Section: Documenting Symptom Characteristics and Psychosocial And Medical History Takingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent proposed criteria (eg, 11 ) not only maintain these core features of PGAD but also contain additional associated features, such as difficulties in psychosocial wellbeing and the possible presence of unwanted/spontaneous orgasms (reported by a third of individuals with PGAD 2 ). These newer proposed criteria are similarly based on expert opinion (for a comparison of proposed PGAD criteria, see 12 ).…”
Section: Pgadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Given these consequences, efforts to educate the public and members of the healthcare system (eg, #PGADFacts social media campaign) should be undertaken to increase its recognition, and screening questions about health history in clinical settings should include those about distressing genital sensations. It has been observed that PGAD shares a number of similarities with other forms of genitopelvic discomfort, 3,12,22 and may be best described as a genitopelvic dysesthesia (defined as an unpleasant sensation 12 ). Screening questions about distressing genitopelvic sensations, which include sensations of arousal as well as pain, should be incorporated into medical history-taking.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Pgad Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other forms of genito-pelvic discomfort, such as vulvar pain, may serve as a useful framework for studying PGAD/GPD HC experiences, as similarities between these conditions have been previously noted. 11 , 12 The patient-HCP relationship and communication between a patient and HCP have been associated with treatment satisfaction in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD; vulvodynia subtype characterized by provoked pain at the vulvar vestibule). In 1 study, almost half the participants with PVD reported that finding a trustworthy HCP was the most important aspect of their diagnostic experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%